Number of rolls of a die to get a particular #

  • Thread starter Thread starter techmologist
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining how many rolls of a die provide an even chance of rolling a specific number, such as six. It concludes that three rolls yield less than an even chance, while four rolls exceed it, indicating that a probability of exactly one-half cannot be achieved with a fixed number of rolls. The equation (5/6)^x = 0.5 suggests an answer of approximately 3.8 rolls, but this is not valid for integral events. The conversation also explores using a random number generator to alternate between three and four rolls, which could create even chances in a repeated trial scenario. Ultimately, the average number of rolls in such a setup may approximate 3.8, though the exact structure of the betting influences the outcome.
techmologist
Messages
305
Reaction score
12
How many rolls of a single die gives you an even chance of rolling, say, a six? Does this problem, as stated, even have a unique answer? Three rolls gives you a less than even chance, while four rolls gives a greater than even chance. It is tempting to solve

(5/6)^x = .5 and get

x = ln 2 / ln (6/5) ~ 3.8

But since the rule that the probability of several independent events is just the product of their individual probabilities only applies for an integral number of events, this answer isn't really justified. All it tells you is that the answer, if there is one, is between 3 and 4.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have answered the question for yourself. Three is not enough and four is too many, so there is no way to get a probability of exactly one half.
 
Right, no single trial is going to give even chances. But in a repeated trial situation, there may be ways to make the chances even. One way would be to use some other randomizer (like random number generator) to decide whether you get 3 or 4 rolls on any particular trial. Actually I guess doing it this way, with the number of rolls being a random variable, really can make a single trial have even chances. But that's getting a little fancy for practical situations. I asked this question because I heard a story about a legendary professional gambler, Titanic Thompson, using this proposition to beat someone out of a fair amount of cash. He allowed the person to alternate rolling three and four rolls, for an average of 3.5 rolls per trial. The person telling it explained that the correct line is 3.8. I wondered how he got that answer. I think the answer depends on the structure of the bet. Do you let the person roll the die three times some fraction of the time and four rolls the other, or one roll and six rolls, two and ten, or whatever? It turns out that when you randomly get 3 or 4 rolls in such a way that chances are even, the average number of rolls is indeed close to 3.8. I haven't tried it yet, but it may turn out that in all these situations, the average number of rolls is close to 3.8. But I really doubt they are all exactly the same. I also thought it was a neat coincidence that naively solving (5/6)^x = .5 gives this answer, because I don't see how that would apply here.
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
Back
Top