Number of solutions to an equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter praharmitra
  • Start date Start date
praharmitra
Messages
308
Reaction score
1
Given the following integer equation x_1 + x_2 + ... x_n = m where x_i \geq 0 and x_i is an integer for all i.

The number of solutions to the above equation is ^{n+m-1}C_m

I was wondering if we could view this as a selection of m objects from a selection of n + m - 1 objects.

Is there a 1-to-1 correspondence between a particular solution of the equation, and a particular selection of m objects from a selection of some n + m - 1 objects.

I hope I have made myself clear. I have tried to figure out such a correspondence, but in vain.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about a selection of n-1 objects?
 
Hey, sorry I haven't replied back on my own thread. Was away.

Anyway, I figured out the required one-to-one correspondence myself. Its pretty much related to the link that @awkward has provided.

So, if anyone still has trouble understanding, I would be glad to explain.

Thanks a lot guys for your help.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top