Numerical methods for system of ODES

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a system of nonlinear coupled ordinary differential equations (ODEs) using numerical methods. The user seeks advice on effective methods, particularly mentioning the adaptive step size RK Dormand-Prince method, but expresses confusion due to unsuccessful attempts at implementation, possibly stemming from programming challenges. Participants highlight the importance of understanding the equations' behavior, noting potential issues with singularities when certain variable values are reached, which could lead to stiff systems. Suggestions include using MATLAB's ode45 function, which employs the Dormand-Prince method, and verifying the implementation against known results to identify coding errors. The conversation emphasizes the need to clarify initial conditions and the parameter k, as these factors significantly influence the system's dynamics.
Themis
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi there. I want to evolve a system of non linear coupled ODEs

\frac{dx}{dt} = \frac{-k}{x^5(56-y^8)^{9/2}}(85+y^{5} + y^{6})

\frac{dy}{dt} = \frac{-k}{x^4(56-y^5)^{7/2}}(44+y^2)

Let's say I have the initial conditions. What numerical method someone could use to solve this? adaptive step size like RK dormand prince method? I am a bit confused cause i tried some with no good results (maybe cause I am not good programmer, not of the method's fault)
 
Technology news on Phys.org
Themis said:
Hi there. I want to evolve a system of non linear coupled ODEs

\frac{dx}{dt} = \frac{-k}{x^5(56-y^8)^{9/2}}(85+y^{5} + y^{6})

\frac{dy}{dt} = \frac{-k}{x^4(56-y^5)^{7/2}}(44+y^2)

Let's say I have the initial conditions. What numerical method someone could use to solve this? adaptive step size like RK dormand prince method? I am a bit confused cause i tried some with no good results (maybe cause I am not good programmer, not of the method's fault)
What do you mean by the term "evolve"?
 
SteamKing said:
What do you mean by the term "evolve"?
Solve them numerically,Any suggestion due to the non linearity and the denominator?
 
Themis said:
Solve them numerically,Any suggestion due to the non linearity and the denominator?
Well, obviously you are going to have a problem if y5 = 58 or y8 = 58 or x = 0.

But the comment, "I tried some with no good result" doesn't really specify what has happened in your case.
 
Yes I noticed that problem with the anomalies. What I don't understand is what method someone could use to numerical integrate this kind of equations. I understand that an adaptive step size method is best for this problem but there are a few and someone with experience could advise a method to approach the problem. I tried to use boost libraries (odeint) but the results are not good. When I run the program the output values seem not to change at all when they should be and the lack of experience doesn't help to find the problem. If you know how to use boost I can't show what I did.
 
As first approach try to use Matlab ode45 function to integrate ODE and see what happens.
If you already have implemented a numerical method for solving ODE try to use it on known results to check that you code has no error.
 
soarce said:
As first approach try to use Matlab ode45 function to integrate ODE and see what happens.
That's equivalent to what the OP already did. Matlab's ode45 uses Dormand Prince by default.

If you already have implemented a numerical method for solving ODE try to use it on known results to check that you code has no error.
I would advise stepping back even further and checking where did those derivatives came from. The singularities in the derivatives are a bit suspect.

To the OP: What are the initial values for x and y, and what is k? If x>1 and 0<y<1, you're not going to see much movement. The derivatives are small because of the factors of 1/x^5 and 1/x^4. Moreover, those singularities at x=0, y=56^(1/8), and y=56^(1/5) make this a very stiff system.
 
  • Like
Likes Pepper Mint

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top