Numerical solution to coupled diff. eq.

  • Thread starter Thread starter mrandersdk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coupled Numerical
mrandersdk
Messages
243
Reaction score
1
I have three equations

(\frac{\partial}{\partial t} + c \frac{\partial}{\partial z}) E_p(z,t) = i N_r(z) \sigma_{ba}(z,t)

\frac{1}{i E_c^*(z,t)}(\frac{\partial}{\partial t} + \Gamma_{bc}) \sigma_{bc}(z,t) = \sigma_{ba}(z,t)

-\frac{E_p(z,t)}{E_c(z,t)} + \frac{1}{i E_c(z,t)}(\frac{\partial}{\partial t} + \Gamma_{ba}) \sigma_{ba}(z,t) = \sigma_{bc}(z,t)

where the functions E_p(z,t) and N_r(z) is know, and all other things that do not depend on time or position are known constants.

How can I solve this numericaly with some give initial conditions. I have MATLAB 7.0 or mathematica to my disposal but can't make anything work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why Numerical?

Did you try finding an exact solution? And are these complex functions or what? Is * Hermitian transpose?
 
yes the function can be complex, but are of real variable, so not need for complex function theory.

the 'i' in the first equation is the complex i.

Do you think it is possible to find and exact solution, that would of cause be great.
 
It is not really too hard to find an exact solution if E_p(z,t) and N_r(z) are known.

From the first equation you have \sigma_{ba}(z,t) in terms of the known funtions E_p(z,t) and N_r(z).

From the 3nd equation you have \sigma_{bc}(z,t) in terms of the known funtions E_p(z,t),\,N_r(z) and the unknown function E_c(z,t).

Plugging these informations into the 2nd equation you have a PDE which involves E_c(z,t) \, and \, E^*_c(z,t), say it (A).

  • If you are looking for real solutions, i.e. E_c(z,t) =E^*_c(z,t) then equation (A) is just an ODE with respect to E_c(z,t) since it involves only the derivative \partial_t E_c(z,t). It looks like

    \partial_t E_c(z,t) \sim \alpha_1\,E_c(z,t) +\alpha_2\,E^3_c(z,t)​

    where \alpha_i are known funtions of (z,t). It can be full integrated either by hand or with the help of Mathematica.
  • If E_c(z,t) is a complex funtion you have to split every term in (A) at it's Real and Imaginary part, in order to end up with two messy[/] DE. Fortunately, in this case too you can integrate the resulting system, by imposing the integrabity conditions on Re[E_c(z,t)]\, and\, Im[E_c(z,t)]


I hope that was useful for you! :smile:
 
Wave phenomena are predicted. Thankfully, at this point, they look to be linear (if gamma & c are constant).

If so, then you may be reasonably safe in using simple numeric strategies.
 
Thread 'Direction Fields and Isoclines'
I sketched the isoclines for $$ m=-1,0,1,2 $$. Since both $$ \frac{dy}{dx} $$ and $$ D_{y} \frac{dy}{dx} $$ are continuous on the square region R defined by $$ -4\leq x \leq 4, -4 \leq y \leq 4 $$ the existence and uniqueness theorem guarantees that if we pick a point in the interior that lies on an isocline there will be a unique differentiable function (solution) passing through that point. I understand that a solution exists but I unsure how to actually sketch it. For example, consider a...
Back
Top