I Numerical solution to the Schrodinger eqn. using Finite Difference Method

patrykh18
Messages
32
Reaction score
2
As part of my project I was asked to use the finite difference method to solve Schrodinger equation. I see how you can turn it into a matrix equation, but I don't know how to solve it if the energy eigenvalues are unknown. Are there any recommended methods I can use to determine those eigenvalues. Maybe for simplicity assume we are dealing with a finite square well and assume that for some reason you can't determine the energies in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
patrykh18 said:
As part of my project I was asked to use the finite difference method to solve Schrodinger equation. I see how you can turn it into a matrix equation, but I don't know how to solve it if the energy eigenvalues are unknown. Are there any recommended methods I can use to determine those eigenvalues. Maybe for simplicity assume we are dealing with a finite square well and assume that for some reason you can't determine the energies in advance.

Do you mean to numerically solve the Schrodinger equation? That does not directly lead to eigenvalues.

What you can do, although this is a lot of work, is to pick an energy, numerically solve the Schrodinger equation for the energy, and then look to see if the wave function blows up as ##x \rightarrow \infty##. If so, try a slightly different energy. You've found an energy eigenvalue if the numerical solution of Schrodinger's equation leads to a wave function that is well-behaved at both ##x=0## and ##x \rightarrow \infty##.

Actually, to solve Schrodinger's equation numerically, you need more than just the energy. You also need boundary conditions at ##x=0##.

(The above is about the one-dimensional Schrodinger equation. In three-dimensions, you can often reduce the problem to a one-dimensional case if you have a spherically symmetric potential by using separation of variables.)
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top