What is the Controversy Surrounding the Obama-Joker Face Meme?

[OmCheeto]

I get the impression you are confused here. To clarify; Shepard Fairey made the Bush-vampire caricature, and commented on the Obama-Joker-socialism caricature of which Firas Alkhateeb made the Obama-Joker image but had no part in the "socialism" branding.

You are correct. I've fixed the post to reflect that. Thank you.

 

[kyleb]

Not a problem OmCheeto, I am always glad to be of help.

Also, considering the original artists inclination to depict Obama in this fashion I am thinking he is likely anon himself.

I figure it is far more likely that Alkhateeb, being of Palestinian descent, was making a symbolic commentary on Obama's transformation from being a strong supporter of Palestinian rights to schmoozing with AIPAC upon making his bid for the presidency. Also, based on the the contents of http://www.flickr.com/photos/khateeb88/" , it seems highly likely he is Muslim, which is hardly compatible with the mentality of Anonymous.

As for speculation of later Anonymous involvement with the image, I generally don't follow their workings, but I took the time to dig around a bit to check and I find the connection tenuous at best. Considering their Joker fetish, I would not be surprised if it were one of their horde who edited the original image into the "why so socialist?" forms one can find elsewhere. However, I have yet to find anything to suggest Anonymous has any particular beef with Obama or socialism, let alone a compulsion to brand Obama as a socialist aside from in jest, so I doubt they have any responsibility for the "socialism" from which has been plastered around more recently. That version is surely the product of the wingnuts who have convinced themselves that Obama's policies are all part of some grand conspiracy to destroy the US, as that is clearly the message it attempts to covey.

 

[OmCheeto]

Not a problem OmCheeto, I am always glad to be of help.


I figure it is far more likely that Alkhateeb, being of Palestinian descent, was making a symbolic commentary on Obama's transformation from being a strong supporter of Palestinian rights to schmoozing with AIPAC upon making his bid for the presidency. Also, based on the the contents of http://www.flickr.com/photos/khateeb88/" , it seems highly likely he is Muslim, which is hardly compatible with the mentality of Anonymous.

And he doesn't like Rahm Emanuel either.

President-elect Obama has appointed Rahm Emanuel as his Chief of Staff.

EPIC FAIL.

Emanuel is a fervent anti-Islam voice in Washington. A Zionist, he takes a hard line stance against the Palestinian cause, and shows a clear anti-Muslim racism.

Besides that, he is the embodiment of "political partisanship" that Obama was supposedly going to change!

I guess we can only blame ourselves. He said "change" we just never bothered asking if he meant good change or bad. Looks like things are not going to get any better or different in Washington.

Change we shouldn't have believed in.

Note: I am neither Democrat nor Republican, Conservative nor Liberal, didn't support Obama or McCain.

I just call it like I see it.

This seems to make sense now. It was the appointment of Emanuel the prompted Alkhateeb to envision Obama as a Joker. In my few conversations with people from the middle east regarding the presence of so many terrorists in their midst, they invariably referred to them as "Jokers". I always thought that was an odd choice of words.

 

[TheStatutoryApe]

This seems to make sense now. It was the appointment of Emanuel the prompted Alkhateeb to envision Obama as a Joker. In my few conversations with people from the middle east regarding the presence of so many terrorists in their midst, they invariably referred to them as "Jokers". I always thought that was an odd choice of words.

Ah, now that's interesting.

I figure it is far more likely that Alkhateeb, being of Palestinian descent, was making a symbolic commentary on Obama's transformation from being a strong supporter of Palestinian rights to schmoozing with AIPAC upon making his bid for the presidency. Also, based on the the contents of Alkhateeb's flicker account, it seems highly likely he is Muslim, which is hardly compatible with the mentality of Anonymous.

As for speculation of later Anonymous involvement with the image, I generally don't follow their workings, but I took the time to dig around a bit to check and I find the connection tenuous at best. Considering their Joker fetish, I would not be surprised if it were one of their horde who edited the original image into the "why so socialist?" forms one can find elsewhere. However, I have yet to find anything to suggest Anonymous has any particular beef with Obama or socialism, let alone a compulsion to brand Obama as a socialist aside from in jest, so I doubt they have any responsibility for the "socialism" from which has been plastered around more recently. That version is surely the product of the wingnuts who have convinced themselves that Obama's policies are all part of some grand conspiracy to destroy the US, as that is clearly the message it attempts to covey.

OmCheeto's post starts to make some sense of why Al Khateeb may have made this particular representation. I have no reason to believe that a muslim would not participate in forums where anon congregate though. I obviously do so myself and I have seen plenty of people jump into the random flame wars regarding the middle east who claim to be muslim. No way to tell if they are sincere of course but there is really no reason to doubt that at least some muslims would lurk and/or participate. I may have stated it more boldly in my earlier post but I am only speculating that he may be anon.

I still don't see rightwing nutbags google scrounging for random images though. And by "Anonymous" I mean the collective form as opposed to the underground 'hacker' subculture. I'm still fairly certain it was one of them. I am pretty sure that all though most anon are just playing that at least a few really are anti-Obama, particularly the hardcore libertarians.

While chances of connecting this to anon may be slim I find the idea that it was one of the Rush/Palin crowd to be far slimmer. I think someone somewhere is sitting back enjoying their handiwork and of the random various people who have claimed ownership of the meme there's just no way to tell.

 

[OmCheeto]

Ah, now that's interesting.


OmCheeto's post starts to make some sense of why Al Khateeb may have made this particular representation. I have no reason to believe that a muslim would not participate in forums where anon congregate though. I obviously do so myself and I have seen plenty of people jump into the random flame wars regarding the middle east who claim to be muslim. No way to tell if they are sincere of course but there is really no reason to doubt that at least some muslims would lurk and/or participate. I may have stated it more boldly in my earlier post but I am only speculating that he may be anon.

I still don't see rightwing nutbags google scrounging for random images though. And by "Anonymous" I mean the collective form as opposed to the underground 'hacker' subculture. I'm still fairly certain it was one of them. I am pretty sure that all though most anon are just playing that at least a few really are anti-Obama, particularly the hardcore libertarians.

While chances of connecting this to anon may be slim I find the idea that it was one of the Rush/Palin crowd to be far slimmer. I think someone somewhere is sitting back enjoying their handiwork and of the random various people who have claimed ownership of the meme there's just no way to tell.

I think it's merely someone's desire to have their 15 minutes of fame, at the cost of others, with no concern to the consequences.

And as Barney Frank said the other day in similar context; "it is a tribute to the First Amendment that this kind of vile, contemptible nonsense is so freely propagated".

 

[WhoWee]

I think it's merely someone's desire to have their 15 minutes of fame, at the cost of others, with no concern to the consequences.

And as Barney Frank said the other day in similar context; "it is a tribute to the First Amendment that this kind of vile, contemptible nonsense is so freely propagated".

Perhaps he was talking about his claims that Fannie/Freddie were sound - just before the collapse?

 

[Ivan Seeking]

So basically, when you (Ivan) have a negative opinion about someone, it is ok if anyone insults them but when you (Ivan) have a positive opinion about someone it is not ok for people to insult them?
Do you see any logical or constitutional problems with that position, Ivan...?

1. Unless you're God (or even a judge), you're not the arbiter of good or bad.
2. That doesn't jive with the concept of free speech.

In any case, I'm glad you acknowledged the double standard - saves me the trouble of digging up year-old quotes from you insulting Bush!

Also, just so we're clear: "our President" is generic, but really what you mean is 'a president I like', right? Or can this just be covered by saying things like that Bush wasn't your president? Now I'm confused - you wouldn't support it against any president, but it was ok against Bush...?

Oh give me a break. It is not a matter of opinion whether the President is OBLIGATED to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution - that is his primary job. What you fail to understand is the difference between opinions, and betrayal that may have risen to the level of treason. The ONLY reason we aren't going after these guys is that they left such a mess in the wake of their abuses that it determined to be in the best interest of the nation not to pursue the matter of treason; a decision that I do not agree with.

People swear to defend the Constitution with their life EVERY DAY. It is too bad that so many fail to understand the significance of this fact. When Bush betrayed the nation, he in effect forfeited his right to power. We simply didn't enforce the law.

I would like to see him, and esp Cheney, tried for war crimes, and crimes against the nation. This is not a political issue. This is a criminal issue. But it seems that the right wing has blinded people to this fact.

For those who think this is some kind of liberal issue, my dedication to the Constitution comes from true Conservatim; not the faux neocrap that you buy into and peddled today as conservatism.

 

[Flat]

While chances of connecting this to anon may be slim I find the idea that it was one of the Rush/Palin crowd to be far slimmer. I think someone somewhere is sitting back enjoying their handiwork and of the random various people who have claimed ownership of the meme there's just no way to tell.

Some anons did do this, or atleast something similiar. About a month ago a few posted that they were hanging up the socialism and were trying to get others to do the same. However, I didn't think that it really caught on.

 

[TheStatutoryApe]

I think it's merely someone's desire to have their 15 minutes of fame, at the cost of others, with no concern to the consequences.

And as Barney Frank said the other day in similar context; "it is a tribute to the First Amendment that this kind of vile, contemptible nonsense is so freely propagated".

As to the consequences I think most people find it funny or ridiculous. There are a bunch of rightwing nutjobs parading around with such pictures and I think most people are wondering how these people can be for real. Getting people to do this is often the deeper point behind the work of "Anonymous" (if it really is) when there is one. It highlights the absurdity of the people who latch onto it.

Some anons did do this, or atleast something similiar. About a month ago a few posted that they were hanging up the socialism and were trying to get others to do the same. However, I didn't think that it really caught on.

I am sure that some people have tried to propagate it. When I first heard about this on the radio I checked into see what was being said about it and saw at least a couple of people taking credit. The teens in Florida certainly fit the demographic though some at least have referred to some conservative talk radio host who was urging people to post more of these.

 

[WhoWee]

For those who think this is some kind of liberal issue, my dedication to the Constitution comes from true Conservatim; not the faux neocrap that you buy into and peddled today as conservatism.

I admire your passion and (as Turbo once explained to me) I know you are a real Conservative. But I'm going to pose the question again, are you concerned about all of Obama's new Czars?

 

[OmCheeto]

As to the consequences I think most people find it funny or ridiculous. There are a bunch of rightwing nutjobs parading around with such pictures and I think most people are wondering how these people can be for real. Getting people to do this is often the deeper point behind the work of "Anonymous" (if it really is) when there is one. It highlights the absurdity of the people who latch onto it.

Well, seeing the swatika exposed on my mothers neckerchief on a photograph when she was 16 only told me that anyone can be led to believe anything when they are young. We really don't need a bunch of rightwing or leftwing nutjobs spewing lies and discontent, to an end that can only lead us to fingerpointing and infighting. I truly hope that you are correct, that people find it funny and ridiculous. But I've been getting feedback to the contrary, from young and old alike, that people are believing this garbage.

It only takes one Timothy McVeigh to kill 168 people. Just imagine if there were thousands of people like him.

The opinions, mixed with lies, sprinkled with truth here and there to make the whole cake look believable, needs to stop.

 

[OmCheeto]

Perhaps he was talking about his claims that Fannie/Freddie were sound - just before the collapse?

Almost, but not quite a good a comeback as http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_081909/content/01125106.guest.html" to Frank's "On what planet do you spend most of your time"?

Isn't it an established fact that Barney Frank himself spends most of his time living around Uranus?

huh.. huuhhhhuhuhu... stupid gay dog...

 

[OmCheeto]

Of course, these people can realize their dream of living in a no-taxes, no-government, guns-for-all society simply by moving to Somalia

badda bump.

source:
http://english.aljazeera.net/focus/2009/08/200982075754210254.html"

 

[WhoWee]

Almost, but not quite a good a comeback as http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_081909/content/01125106.guest.html" to Frank's "On what planet do you spend most of your time"?


huh.. huuhhhhuhuhu... stupid gay dog...

Rush was just mean (or something?) - I was trying to invoke an ironic comparison.

 

[lisab]

badda bump.

source:
http://english.aljazeera.net/focus/2009/08/200982075754210254.html"

Ahahaha...he stole my line! Only I usually use random third-world countries that the person with whom I'm debating has never heard of. Better yet I'll make one up (Zurzickstan or something), just for my own amusement.

 

[OmCheeto]

Rush was just mean (or something?) - I was trying to invoke an ironic comparison.

Bah! Cheap shots are a dime a dozen. Deep thought's only come through research, contemplation, introspection, dialogue, and http://www.deepthoughtsbyjackhandey.com/yesterday-1.asp?DayW=6" .

 

[kldickson]

You can never go wrong with Jack Handey's Deep Thoughts.

Also, you can never go wrong with a healthy amount of misanthropy. Well-cultivated contempt for humanity as a whole (with exceptions for individuals and a few certain groups) is a sign of wisdom. Although it's better to be cheerful about it.

 

[kldickson]

Moral of the story: Most people are stupid.

 

[kyleb]

I have no reason to believe that a muslim would not participate in forums where anon congregate though. I obviously do so myself and I have seen plenty of people jump into the random flame wars regarding the middle east who claim to be muslim.

Droping by to argue I don't doubt, but Anonymous's general irreverence towards everything doesn't rightly jive with religion.