Object Approaching Black Hole: Time Dilation & Visibility

AI Thread Summary
As an object approaches a black hole, it appears to never cross the event horizon due to time dilation, leading to the perception that it is frozen in time. Light emitted from near the event horizon is heavily redshifted, making it effectively invisible to distant observers. While light from outside the black hole can be warped around it, it does not contribute to the black hole's visibility as it gets redshifted out of existence. Observers falling into the black hole experience time normally, contrasting with the perception of static observers far away. The discussion highlights the complexities of light behavior and time perception near black holes.
FOIWATER
Gold Member
Messages
434
Reaction score
12
I have red that as an object approaches a black hole, to an observer the object never appears to pass the event horizon because of time dilation.

If so why does the hole appear black, wouldn't the same thing happen to the light, and wouldn't it spread over the surface of the black hole, making it visible?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
FOIWATER said:
I have red that as an object approaches a black hole, to an observer the object never appears to pass the event horizon because of time dilation.

If so why does the hole appear black, wouldn't the same thing happen to the light, and wouldn't it spread over the surface of the black hole, making it visible?

what you are talking about happens because the light is red-shifted and yes, the light coming in DOES get affected the same way ... it gets red-shifted out of existence for all practical purposes.
 
The incoming light does get redshifted, but, not to the extent of the outgoing light.
 
FOIWATER said:
I have red that as an object approaches a black hole, to an observer the object never appears to pass the event horizon because of time dilation.

If so why does the hole appear black, wouldn't the same thing happen to the light, and wouldn't it spread over the surface of the black hole, making it visible?

Light emitted from closer and closer to the event horizon does indeed get heavily redshifted. Light that comes from somewhere else and doesn't enter the event horizon is warped around the black hole but does not have a net redshift, as it was first blueshifted when it approached the black hole and then red shifted on the way out. One effect is that if you were close to a black hole you would see the background being seriously warped near it.
 
I have red that as an object approaches a black hole, to an observer the object never appears to pass the event horizon because of time dilation.

That is a view for a static [accelerating] observer well outside the horizon in Schwarzschild coordinates; for a free falling observer, time passes normally and the blackness approaches as you would expect. In ther coordinate systems, effects are different.

A crude analogy in everday life might be "Are distant objects really smaller than nearby objects." Or is it an 'illusion'?? Which is 'real'?
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Back
Top