Objective+Scientific Differences Between Good Floods and Bad Floods? Need Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheAzn
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the differences between "good" floods, like those of the Nile River, and "bad" floods, such as those of the Yellow River, focusing on their impacts and predictability. The Yellow River's high silt content, averaging 40%, contributes to its destructive flooding, while the Nile's floods are more controlled and beneficial for agriculture. Historical context reveals that despite similar population densities, the death toll from Yellow River floods has been significantly higher due to its unpredictable nature. Participants seek academic resources on river siltation control that are accessible to non-engineers, emphasizing the need for practical methods tailored to specific river conditions. Ultimately, effective flood control methods, such as dams, are highlighted as crucial in managing these natural disasters.
TheAzn
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Objective+Scientific Differences Between "Good"Floods and "Bad"Floods? Need Help

I am always baffled by this problem. The example would be the Yellow River in China and the Nile River in Egypt. Both rivers replenish the soil nutrients with their floodings. However, the flooding of the Yellow River in China are known for causing huge death tolls, while the ones in Egypt do not. Why is the flooding of the Nile more predictable?

The Yellow River is known as "China's Sorrow", while the flooding of the Nile in Egypt is celebrated during Wafaa El-Nil.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flooding_of_the_Nile

What causes the Yellow River to be more deadly than the Nile River?
Both the Yellow River and the Nile River are densely populated, yet the death toll historically were very different.

The answer seems to lie in the fact that the Yellow River has a much higher silt content. Averagely speaking, the Yellow River has about 40% Silt content, one the highest in the world. One of its tributaries even contained as much as 60% Silt content. Yet, the Chinese people were not idiots and retards. The other civilizations have no problem with their silt control. The Chinese should have been able to control the Yellow River, even if the Yellow River was a bit more "special".
Unless, of course, the Yellow River was "very special" not just "a bit" more special.

Do you guys know of any good academic books that talk about river siltation control?
Since I am not an engineer, I do not want books with a lot of engineering jargon. However, I still want a good authoritative book. By that I meant that the book should:
1. Talk about the different methods that have been used in the passed to control the level of silt content

2. Talk about when and where such methods were invented

3. Most importantly, talks about how some methods that can be used effectively on some rivers CANNOT be apply to certain other rivers.


Guess, I still have to end up reading a large engineering book :/

Thank you
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I would think the biggest parameter is the vertical flood rise in meters.

Depending on the water volume at spring flood, and the shape of the river valley, the flood can spread to a wide area at shallow depths and low velocity. It can also be a raging torrent in a gorge.

Those are natural differences, not man-made.

The most effective means of man made flood control is the dam.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top