Observational Dark Energy - SN1a wiggle room?

  • Thread starter Nereid
  • Start date
  • #1
Nereid
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
3,367
2
Detailed observations of distant Type 1a supernovae, by two independent teams, are what got astrophysicists and cosmologists salivating about 'dark energy' (and the many possible physical processes that could give rise to it).

Systematic effects (including mis-identification) are, of course, the bane of astronomy, and considerable effort has been devoted to identifying, and characterising, these wrt observational results leading to DE conclusions - accurate characterisations (a.k.a. 'how can you be sure it's a distant SN1a?'), selection biases of many kinds, (cosmological) evolutionary factors (WDs of long ago were 'different' than today's), dust (grey or otherwise) in the SN galaxy, etc, etc, etc.

What are your favourite papers, that slay one or more fearsome 'systematic' dragons? Which such dragon(s) do you consider still has at least some life (if only tenuous)?

What's that?

What are mine?

Well, 'where are the hypernovae, in these distant galaxies?' is one; another is 'how good a standard candle are hypernovae?'
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
wolram
Gold Member
4,267
557
A ruler any one will do.
 

Related Threads on Observational Dark Energy - SN1a wiggle room?

Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
837
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Last Post
3
Replies
66
Views
8K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
Top