Observational Evidence for Extra Dimensions from Dark Matter

Vast
Messages
284
Reaction score
0
http://xxx.arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0508572

I like the way the title of this paper captures ones attention. For a minute there I thought they had finally found some evidence for string theory.

From what I understand they’re speculating on astronomical observations of dark matter, by comparing the strength of self-interacting dark matter in small galaxies and that of galaxy clusters, (which is still under debate) and suggesting that this is potential evidence for extra dimensions. However these extra dimensions are bigger than usual:

The extra dimensions that Silk and colleagues say they have identified are likewise 'big', at about a nanometre across. In other words, they say, the Universe is only about a nanometre wide in these three 'directions'.

Nature

Don’t ask me to picture that in my head. :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd kinda figured 6 spatial dimensions also...

...2 sets of 3 interchanging at superluminal speed to create time and motion

only my 3 are exactly the same size blinking in and out in the same spot...

...nothing actually moves, its only the background changing shape or in our case the foreground
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top