Obtaining Euclidean action from Minkowski action

  • Thread starter Thread starter spaghetti3451
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Euclidean Minkowski
AI Thread Summary
The Euclidean classical action for a scalar field is derived from the Minkowski action through a Wick rotation, transforming time from real to imaginary values. The Minkowski action includes a negative potential term, while the Euclidean action has a positive potential term. The derivation involves substituting the time variable with an imaginary counterpart and adjusting the action accordingly. The resulting Euclidean action maintains the structure of the kinetic and potential terms, leading to a positive formulation. This transformation is crucial for applications in quantum field theory and statistical mechanics.
spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
The Euclidean classical action ##S_{\text{cl}}[\phi]## for a scalar field ##\phi## is given by

\begin{equation}
S_{\text{cl}}[\phi]=\int d^{4}x\ \bigg(\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\phi)^{2}+U(\phi)\bigg).
\end{equation}

This can be obtained from the action ##S_{\text{Mn}}[\phi]## in Minkowski space for the same scalar field ##\phi## as given by

\begin{equation}
S_{\text{Mn}}[\phi]=\int d^{4}x\ \bigg(\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\phi)^{2}-U(\phi)\bigg).
\end{equation}

To transform the action ##S_{\text{Mn}}[\phi]## in Minkowski space to the Euclidean classical action ##S_{\text{cl}}[\phi]##, one needs to perform a Wick rotation. I need someone to show the derivation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Continue from real x^{0} to x^{0} = - i x_{4}, and from S_{Min} so obtained get S_{Euc} using S_{Euc} = - i S_{Min}:
S_{M} = \int dx^0 \ d^3x \ \left( (1/2) (\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x^{0}})^{2} - (1/2) (\nabla \phi)^{2} - U(\phi) \right)
S_{M} = -i \int dx_{4} \ d^3x \ \left( - (1/2) (\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x_{4}})^{2} - (1/2) (\nabla \phi)^{2} - U(\phi) \right)
S_{M} = i \int dx_{4} \ d^3x \ \left( (1/2) (\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x_{4}})^{2} + (1/2) (\nabla \phi)^{2} + U(\phi) \right) = i S_{E}
S_{E} = \int d^{4}x_{E} \ \left( (1/2) (\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x_{\mu}})^{2} + U(\phi) \right)
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top