I OCD radiophobe spouse suspects radiation burn

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jeroen Cranendonk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radiation
Jeroen Cranendonk
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
My spouse has severe OCD and radiophobia. I realize this is not exactly the most appropriate venue for our questions, but hopefully somebody can help us in the right direction.

She noticed several small (3-5mm), circular petechiae in a regular pattern across a roughly 6x6in area on my left upper back, and a horizontal band of smaller spots below it. The spots do not itch or hurt, and are not raised above the surrounding skin. Her worry is that these spots are radiation burns; the size and spacing seems to match holes in a steel bench, and radioactive contamination of the steel supply is one of her fears.

Is there any way to rule out radioactive contamination as the source of these spots? I'd be happy to provide any additional information that may help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is absolutely no way you can get radiation burns from a steel bench unless you put that steel bench into a nuclear reactor for a while, and then sit on it with skin contact and completely motionless for a while to get the pattern. And even then the pattern would be the opposite - burned skin where the bench is and potentially weaker damage where holes are.

If the pattern is from the steel bench, it is probably pressure-related mechanical damage.
 
Her worry is that a sufficiently powerful radioactive source behind the suspected bench would cause surface burns similar to the bench's hole pattern. (There was construction ongoing nearby, and she has specific worries about the radioactive "pigtail" used in industrial radiography.)

Would the physiological response be any different than what we're seeing? Would clothing and distance affect the injury, and in what way? Is there a difference in injuries seen for α, β, and γ activity?
 
Jeroen Cranendonk said:
My spouse has severe OCD and radiophobia. I realize this is not exactly the most appropriate venue for our questions, but hopefully somebody can help us in the right direction.

She noticed several small (3-5mm), circular petechiae in a regular pattern across a roughly 6x6in area on my left upper back, and a horizontal band of smaller spots below it. The spots do not itch or hurt, and are not raised above the surrounding skin. Her worry is that these spots are radiation burns; the size and spacing seems to match holes in a steel bench, and radioactive contamination of the steel supply is one of her fears.

Is there any way to rule out radioactive contamination as the source of these spots? I'd be happy to provide any additional information that may help.
Sure; "radiation burn" isn't really a thing, at least in the way you are using it.

But that isn't your problem; your problem is that phobias can't be countered with logic, they must be countered with psychological care. Please get some for her. Thread locked.
 
  • Like
Likes Imager and mfb
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
10K
Back
Top