Odd vs. Even number of Nucleons.

  • Thread starter Thread starter WatermelonPig
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    even Nucleons
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the introductory nuclear science class and the reading of Rhodes's "Making of the Atomic Bomb." It highlights the significance of U235 having an even number of nucleons after neutron bombardment, which contrasts with U238's odd number and affects fission likelihood. The conversation also touches on the concept of parity in nuclear binding and stability, suggesting a connection to electron orbital pairings. Additionally, there is a mention of an older thread that could provide further insights on this topic. Overall, the participants express enthusiasm for the subject and the upcoming nuclear engineering class.
WatermelonPig
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
Yeah I'm taking this introductory nuclear science class, we're reading Rhodes's Making of the Atomic Bomb. Apparently, U235 with a neutron added now has an even number of nucleons while U238 obviously has an odd number with the single neutron bombarment. And this affects fission likelihood. So, why is this?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
There's an older thread here which you might find valuable on the role of parity in nuclear binding and stability.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=290735

WatermelonPig said:
Yeah I'm taking this introductory nuclear science class, we're reading Rhodes's Making of the Atomic Bomb

I must say, I think that's a very good choice of literature for an "introductory nuclear science" class. :)

PS: Apparently some people don't like thread necromancy, but personally, if it's < 1 a and I'm contributing helpful content to the people who haven't gotten any reply previously, then why not?
 
Thank yo for this response. The explanation seems very much like the reasons for electron orbital pairings. Apparently there is some differential equation which when solved shows this explicitly. And yeah that was a great class and I'm looking forward towards taking my first nuclear engineering class this fall.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top