Odds/Probability question - Roulette

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bobbo7410
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the comparison of two betting systems in the game of Roulette, focusing on their expected outcomes and risks. Participants analyze the probabilities and potential returns of each method over multiple rounds of play.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes two betting methods: the first with a 50% chance to win back the original bet and the second with a 66% chance to win back half the original bet.
  • Another participant challenges the initial calculations, stating that the original money should not be included in the winnings, leading to a reevaluation of the expected values for both methods.
  • A later post recalculates the expected outcomes for both methods, suggesting that both methods yield an equal expected value of 0 when properly accounted for.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of standard deviation, indicating that while both methods may have the same expected value, the first method is riskier due to its higher standard deviation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the overall effectiveness of the two methods. While some calculations suggest that both methods yield equal expected values, there is disagreement regarding the implications of risk and the interpretation of the results.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of winning and losing amounts, as well as the interpretation of expected values and risks associated with each betting method.

bobbo7410
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Alright, my brains a little shot right now so I need some help. I've been studying the Casino game of Roulette and I was curious how this idea would work out.Lets say you put in $20 each time and there are 2 different systems.

1st way: 50% chance to win back what you put in. So your original $20 + $20.

2nd way: 66% chance to win back half what you put in. So your original $20 + $10.

Either way the max you could lose is $20 yet the 2nd way you would be risking more for less. Over the course of let's say 10 turns doing the same way each time, which system would provide the best results??From what I've gathered:
[edit: Revised the work below in post #3.]

Method 1 would give roughly 5 wins. 5 wins = $40 per win = $200
5 loses = $-20 per loss = $-100 In this method, you win $100 roughly.

Method two, you'd expect around 6.66 wins. 6.66 wins = $30 per win = $199.8
3.34 losses = $66.8
210 - 60 = $133

Yet there has to be a flaw somewhere, that would increase the odds of winning to over 50% for method two..
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
bobbo7410 said:
Method 1 would give roughly 5 wins. 5 wins = $40 per win = $200
5 loses = $-20 per loss = $-100 In this method, you win $100 roughly.

Method two, you'd expect around 6.66 wins. 6.66 wins = $30 per win = $199.8
3.34 losses = $66.8
210 - 60 = $133

Yet there has to be a flaw somewhere, that would increase the odds of winning to over 50% for method two..

Your numbers are wrong, because you're including your original money as 'winnings'. It should be clear that the first method has an expected value of $0 per turn, not $10.
 
Yeah I was simply going along with a helping answer from someone else, I'm not sure why I followed it and included the bet money.So to re-do the work:

Lets say you put in $20 each time and there are 2 different systems. (10 times each)

Method 1 would give 5 wins/5 losses.
5 wins at $20 per win = $100 won
5 losses at $20 per loss = $100 lost
aka 50%

Method 2, would give around 6.66 wins/3.34 losses.
6.66 wins at $10 per win = $66.66 won
3.33 losses at $20 per loss = $66.66 lost
aka 50%

So both methods are equal?? Or did I mess this up again.
 
bobbo7410 said:
Lets say you put in $20 each time and there are 2 different systems.

1st way: 50% chance to win back what you put in. So your original $20 + $20.

2nd way: 66% chance to win back half what you put in. So your original $20 + $10.
1st way: .5 chance of winning $20, .5 chance of losing $20: expected value .5(20)+ .5(-20)= 0.

2nd way: .66 chance of winning $10, .34 chance of losing $20: expected value .66(10)+ .34(-20)= -.02.

If you meant 2/3 chance of winning $10, 1/3 chance of losing $20 then: expected value (2/3)(10)- (1/3)(20)= 0.

They are both "fair bets". If you look at the standard deviation, however:
\sqrt{.5(20)^2+ .5(-20)^2}= 20 and \sqrt{(2/3)(10)^2+ (1/3)(20)^2}= \sqrt{200}= 14.14. The first is a "riskier" bet than the second.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K