ODE - Proof of a Particular Solution

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the non-homogeneous second-order linear differential equation represented by the equation (1) y'' + p(x)y' + q(x)y = g(x). A particular solution can be constructed using the complementary solutions y1 and y2 of the associated homogeneous equation (2) y'' + p(x)y' + q(x)y = 0, through the method of variation of parameters. The solution is expressed as Yp = u1*y1 + u2*y2, where u1 and u2 are functions determined by solving a system of equations derived from the differential equation. The discussion emphasizes that Green's function serves as a generalization of this method.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of second-order linear differential equations
  • Familiarity with the method of variation of parameters
  • Knowledge of Green's functions in differential equations
  • Ability to perform calculus operations, including differentiation and integration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Green's functions in solving differential equations
  • Explore the method of variation of parameters in greater detail
  • Practice solving non-homogeneous differential equations using specific examples
  • Review the properties and solutions of second-order linear differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are dealing with differential equations, particularly those interested in advanced solution techniques and applications of Green's functions.

gabriels-horn
Messages
92
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Image6.jpg


Homework Equations


(1) y\prime\prime+p(x)y\prime+q(x)y=g(x)
(2) y\prime\prime+p(x)y\prime+q(x)y=0

If y1 and y2 are complimentary solutions of (2), then a particular solution of (1) is given by Yp = u1*y1 + u2*y2


The Attempt at a Solution


Anyone have a good starting idea for this one? Perhaps someone with some insight on Green's function?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What this problem shows is that Green's function is a generalization of "variation of parameters".

If y1 and y2 are complimentary solutions, then you seek a specific solution of the form y(x)= u(x)y1(x)+ v(x)y2(x). Of course, there are many function, u and v, that will satisfy that. Differentiating, y'= u'y1+ uy1'+ v'y2+ vy2', by the product rule. Because there are many possible solutions, we narrow the search and simplify the problem by requiring that u'y1+ v'y2= 0. Now, we have y'= uy1'+ vy2' so y"= u'y1'+ uy1"+ v'y2'+ vy2". Putting that into the original differential equation, y"+ py'+ qy= u'y1'+ uy1"+ v'y2'+ vy2"+ puy'1+ pvy2'+ quy1+ qvy2= (uy1"+ puy1'+ quy1)+ (vy2"+ pvy2'+ qvy2)+ (u'y1'+ v'uy2')= g(x).

But uy1"+ puy1'+ quy1= u(y1"+ py1'+ qy1)= 0 because y1 satisfies the homogenous equation and vy2"+ pvy2"+ qvy2= v(y1"+ py1'+ qy1)= 0 because y2 satisfies the homogenous equation. That leave u'y1'+ v'y2'= g(x).

Together with u'y1+ v'y2= 0, that give two equations we can solve, algebraically, for u' and v'. Do that, then integrate to get the formula you want.
 
HallsofIvy said:
What this problem shows is that Green's function is a generalization of "variation of parameters".

If y1 and y2 are complimentary solutions, then you seek a specific solution of the form y(x)= u(x)y1(x)+ v(x)y2(x). Of course, there are many function, u and v, that will satisfy that. Differentiating, y'= u'y1+ uy1'+ v'y2+ vy2', by the product rule. Because there are many possible solutions, we narrow the search and simplify the problem by requiring that u'y1+ v'y2= 0. Now, we have y'= uy1'+ vy2' so y"= u'y1'+ uy1"+ v'y2'+ vy2". Putting that into the original differential equation, y"+ py'+ qy= u'y1'+ uy1"+ v'y2'+ vy2"+ puy'1+ pvy2'+ quy1+ qvy2= (uy1"+ puy1'+ quy1)+ (vy2"+ pvy2'+ qvy2)+ (u'y1'+ v'uy2')= g(x).

But uy1"+ puy1'+ quy1= u(y1"+ py1'+ qy1)= 0 because y1 satisfies the homogenous equation and vy2"+ pvy2"+ qvy2= v(y1"+ py1'+ qy1)= 0 because y2 satisfies the homogenous equation. That leave u'y1'+ v'y2'= g(x).

Together with u'y1+ v'y2= 0, that give two equations we can solve, algebraically, for u' and v'. Do that, then integrate to get the formula you want.

Great insight. Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K