Of the three classes to take, which is best?

  • Thread starter Thread starter algebra2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Classes
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the benefits of three academic fields: Psychology, Literature and Arts, and Journalism. Participants express varying opinions on which fields are most advantageous, particularly in relation to different majors. One viewpoint emphasizes the importance of Literature and Writing courses for enhancing reading and writing skills, which are deemed essential for all scientists. Another perspective highlights the value of Psychology, citing its broad applicability to understanding science and life. Additionally, there is a suggestion that Journalism may be particularly beneficial for science, engineering, or math majors, as it equips students with the skills to communicate complex ideas to a general audience. Overall, the consensus leans towards prioritizing Literature and Journalism for their practical applications in various fields.
algebra2
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
A. Psychology
B. Literature and Arts
C. Journalism (Newspaper)

tell me from your perspective which is most beneficial? but of the three, which two are best?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It'll probably depend on what your major is.

In my experience, I would go for a literature/art/writing course over the other two, with journalism second. Every scientist should be able to read well and know how to write and express themselves correctly, in my opinion. Literature/writing courses can help with this.
 
I would pick A and B :smile:

I personally like Psychology, and Literature was sometimes fun too.
 
Ive taken psychology, and honestly its the best course I've ever done. I has taught me so much about science and life in general. But the writing courses couldn't hurt you. I haven't done them so I dunno.
 
Well, if you ask me. I think the journalism class (if you're a science, engineering or math major) is probably going to be most beneficial since sometimes you'll probably have to express technical ideas in terms understandable to laymen. I don't really see how the other 2 would help.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Back
Top