Ohm's law (i.e., I forgot my Algebra)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ASEmech
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Law Ohm's law
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around Ohm's Law, specifically focusing on the calculation of resistance in parallel circuits. Participants explore the formulas involved and the reasoning behind them, addressing both conceptual understanding and algebraic manipulation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the formula for total resistance in parallel circuits, questioning why the formula involves division and how it relates to the series resistance formula.
  • Another participant clarifies that the total resistance in series is simply the sum of the resistances, while in parallel, the formula involves the reciprocal of the sum of the reciprocals of the individual resistances.
  • A further explanation is provided that emphasizes the nature of current flow in parallel circuits, suggesting that having multiple paths reduces the total resistance.
  • One participant attempts to derive the parallel resistance formula using Ohm's Law and the condition that voltage across each resistor is the same.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the distinction between series and parallel circuits, but there is no consensus on the participant's initial confusion regarding the formulas and their derivation.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the discussion may benefit from being in a more specialized forum, indicating a potential mismatch in the audience's expertise.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals studying electrical systems, particularly those seeking clarification on Ohm's Law and the behavior of resistors in parallel circuits.

ASEmech
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm an ASE certified Technician specializing in Brakes and Four-wheel Alignments. I'm going to go for my cert. in Electrical systems this fall. As I began my self-study in electrical systems, I realized...I forgot my Algebra.

I'm currently studying Ohm's Law. Within Ohm's Law, I'm studying Resistance in a parallel circuit. The formula I'm given is:

R0=1/(1/R1) + (1/R2) = (R1 x R2)/(R1 + R2)

...where R0 (read R-sub0) is a combination of resistances R-sub1 and R-sub2.

I thought the sum of the resistances in any circuit was R0=R1+R2. Why is 1 divided by (1/R1) + (1/R2) and in the "denominator portion" of the formula, why is 1 divided by R1 (same question for 1 divided by R2) and then added to 1/R2? Also, how do you get from R0=1/(1/R1) + (1/R2) to (R1 x R2)/(R1 + R2)?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For resistors in series Rt = R1 + R2
In parallel it's 1/Rt = 1/R1 + 1/R2

For just a pair of resistors you can simplify this to
Rt = (R1*R2) / (R1 + R2)
 
This thread probably belongs in the EE forum.
Anyway,

R_{tot}=R_1+R_2 is only correct if the resistors are connected in series. In
a parallell ciruit the current can flow in several branches at once which is why you need to use the 1/R_{tot}=1/R_1+... formula.
This makes sense if you think about. Let's say you have two 1K resistors connected in parallell; now the current can flow via two different paths and since the resistors have the same value each one will carry half the current; plugging two 1K resistors into the formula for parallel resistors you will see that you end up with an equivalent resistance of 500 ohm. This is what you would expect since the two paths make "half as difficult" for the current to flow; i.e. connecting resistors in parallel REDUCES the total resistance.

You can derive the formula yourself by just using ohms law and remembering that the voltage across each of the resistors must be the same since they are connected in series.

Also

1/R=1/R1+1/R2 =R2/(R1*R2)+R1/(R2*R1=(R1+R2)/(R1*R2)
i.e.
1/R=(R1+R2)/(R1*R2)
meaning R=R1*R2/(R1+R2),
 
Thanks, guys. I put this here because when I first saw this formula the first thing I thought of was Alg. 1.

Thanks again!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
14K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K