Ok I just understanding a little pre-cal

  • Thread starter Thread starter austin1250
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the domain and range of exponential functions like e^x and transformations such as 2^x, where the domain remains all reals and the range changes to (2, infinity). It emphasizes that linear transformations and multiplicative inverses can alter the domain and range, suggesting further inquiry if needed. The second part addresses the relationship between natural logarithms and logarithms of base 10, highlighting the use of the change of base formula to convert between them. Participants are encouraged to apply this formula to solve specific logarithmic equations. Overall, the thread provides foundational insights into graph transformations and logarithmic conversions.
austin1250
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
In calc we are having like this flash card quiz and you have to apply things to the graph of like e^x or lnx.

I was wondering how do you determine the domain range of graphs like these.

for example e^x graph domain is all reals, and the range is 0 to infinity. How would you transform this graph and still determine the domain/range? would it be like 2^x and then the range just changes to 2 to infinity?


And also question about ln verse log base of 10

how would you go about like getting ln100 and find out what is that equal to of the follwing in base 10.

ex answer choices are. log e , 2/log e , log(100e), log e /2 , none of these
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For an exponential a^x, the domain is all reals and range (0,infinity) for any constant a. The domain and range would change for linear transformations, as well as multiplicative inverses, so if you need to know about those, you should ask.

You're second question has to do with the change of base formula.

log_b (a) = log_k (a)/log_k (b) for any k that you want. You should be able to figure it out from there.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top