Ok im mad confused about generators and kilowatt/kw hours

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the confusion regarding generators, kilowatts (kW), kilowatt-hours (kWh), and how power companies price electricity. Participants explore the relationship between power output from generators and the costs associated with electricity consumption over time.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the pricing of electricity based on generator output and the difference between kW and kWh.
  • Another participant explains that using 100 kW for one hour at a rate of 7 cents per kWh would cost $7, and extends this to a month, calculating a total of $5,040 for continuous use.
  • There is a note that real commercial electric bills are more complex, factoring in load factor and demand, which could affect the overall cost.
  • Participants discuss the fuel consumption of the generator, noting that running it for a month would incur significant costs, suggesting that electricity is relatively cheap in comparison.
  • Some participants mention the implications of load factors and demand charges, indicating that these can lead to higher costs for consumers who do not use power consistently.
  • There are references to cogeneration and net metering, with a participant suggesting that selling power back to the grid could be an option for some users.
  • Concerns are raised about the complexity of net metering agreements and how they can lead to unexpected costs based on peak usage times.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints regarding the pricing of electricity, the implications of generator output, and the complexities of commercial electric bills. There is no consensus on the best approach to understanding or managing these costs, indicating an ongoing debate.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the calculations and assumptions made depend on specific conditions, such as the type of generator used, local electricity rates, and the nature of the load. The discussion highlights the variability in pricing and the factors that influence electricity costs.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in understanding electricity pricing, those considering the use of generators, and consumers looking to manage their energy costs more effectively.

Qaiphyx
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
Ok I am mad confused about generators and kilowatt/kw hours...

And how the power companies price stuff.

http://www.peakpowertools.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=GGNQT100&Show=ExtInfo

That thing produces 100kW

I pay roughly 7 cents per kW hour from my power company.

So if I used the same amount of power as that generator puts out running for a full month at that price, would I pay $7 or would it be more cause its rated at kW and not kW hour, which I am sure is the case, I just don't know how much more... how much more would I pay?

Cause for the size of that generator running for a whole month I would expect it to put out a hell of a lot more that $7 of electricity.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
If you have a load of 100 watt for 10 hours, that's 1 kwh.
 
OK... I am confused by your confusion.

If you were using 100 kW for 1 hour and paying 7 cents per kW-hour, you would pay $7 for the privilege. A month would be longer.
 
A kWh (kilowatt-hour) is a unit of energy. A kW (kilowatt) is a unit of power. One kWh is the amount of energy transferred over one hour at a power of 1 kW. If you ran a 5kW heater for 2 hours, you would use 10kWh of energy.

If you use 100kW constantly for thirty days, that would be 72,000kWh of energy (720 hours x 100 kW). At 7 cents per kWh, that works out at $5,040.
 
Just a note, I don't know the purpose of this exercise, but real commercial electric bills are much more complicated. You pay based on load factor (how consistent the load is) and demand as well as total consumption. So if you're trying to decide if a generator might be a good idea to cut your electric bills, you'll need to take that into account.
 
dlgoff said:
If you have a load of 100 watt for 10 hours, that's 1 kwh.

Phrak said:
OK... I am confused by your confusion.

If you were using 100 kW for 1 hour and paying 7 cents per kW-hour, you would pay $7 for the privilege. A month would be longer.

brewnog said:
A kWh (kilowatt-hour) is a unit of energy. A kW (kilowatt) is a unit of power. One kWh is the amount of energy transferred over one hour at a power of 1 kW. If you ran a 5kW heater for 2 hours, you would use 10kWh of energy.

If you use 100kW constantly for thirty days, that would be 72,000kWh of energy (720 hours x 100 kW). At 7 cents per kWh, that works out at $5,040.

Ok yah this is exactly what I was think, but I had nothing to base it off of to be sure. Thanks guys.
 
Average actual cost of electric power in the United States is 10.6 cents per KWhour. It varies greatly from state to state. The cheapest is Washington state at 7 cents. I imagine it's a result of readily available hydrolic power, and federally subsidized dams.

Hawaii has the highest prices at 24 cents. 51% of electric power generation is through burning coal, having exceptional energy per dollar cost for heat engine generation.

Those in low sulpher, coal rich states should experience a better price break than average. Environmental and community activism can push up the price in places like California where they pay 14 cents.
 
Last edited:
russ_watters said:
Just a note, I don't know the purpose of this exercise, but real commercial electric bills are much more complicated. You pay based on load factor (how consistent the load is) and demand as well as total consumption. So if you're trying to decide if a generator might be a good idea to cut your electric bills, you'll need to take that into account.

Good point.

I think load factors are such a rip-off, you have to pay more for using less.

CS
 
stewartcs said:
Good point.

I think load factors are such a rip-off, you have to pay more for using less.

CS

But how would you feel if you were a power company trying to guarantee supply for a completely unpredictable demand?
 
  • #10
brewnog said:
If you use 100kW constantly for thirty days, that would be 72,000kWh of energy (720 hours x 100 kW). At 7 cents per kWh, that works out at $5,040.

Wow the fuel consumption on that generator is 15 gph of lp. If I bought enough gas to run it for a month it would cost $40,000.

Electricity is cheap.
 
  • #11
15gph of lp?

What does that mean?
 
  • #12
brewnog said:
15gph of lp?

What does that mean?

lp = liquified Petroleum = propane

gph = gallon per hour.
 
  • #13
montoyas7940 said:
Wow the fuel consumption on that generator is 15 gph of lp. If I bought enough gas to run it for a month it would cost $40,000.

Electricity is cheap.
Note, natural gas is slightly more than half the cost of propane.
 
  • #14
russ_watters said:
Note, natural gas is slightly more than half the cost of propane.

Natural gas also has less BTU per unit than propane. Not sure how much, but it is significant.
 
  • #15
brewnog said:
But how would you feel if you were a power company trying to guarantee supply for a completely unpredictable demand?

The demand is predictable, it's just not constant which is why they charge you the load factor. Load factors are used by power companies to "spread" the cost of the capital expenditures they have incurred as a cost of doing business. The cost of doing business is the power line, transformers, etc. in the distribution system that were orginally designed for a predicted load. So, if you don't use power as they predicted, you have to pay more so they can make the profit they want.

CS
 
  • #16
Averagesupernova said:
Natural gas also has less BTU per unit than propane. Not sure how much, but it is significant.
It is, but even when you include that, propane is still almost twice as expensive on a per btu basis.
 
  • #17
You seem to be in the US - most utiltities here allow cogeneration. Ask your power company. You can actually sell power back to the the "grid" and keep track of it with net metering

If your operation runs mostly during the day, projections for energy generation costs strongly suggest that you look at photovoltaic cogeneration. This has limited practicality right now for high demand applications, like running an electric kiln. Most US utilities have a fuel adjustment or fuel surcharge that the public power commission allows them to charge. A LOT of bucks will be in that one item as time goes on and as fuel costs rise.

The other price driver is demand. If you turn on all your compressors (as an example) at 8:00 am you are pushing demand thru the roof. Each KwH costs more as demand goes up. For the whole month.

Sequentially starting large motors- ie. start #1 wait a minute, then start #2, etc. will decrease demand. But if you screw up just once, then increased demand charges will be in effect for the whole monthly billing period.

Get an energy audit - if you do not know which gizmo drives up demand/consumption, ask for check meters to be installed for a month or two.
 
  • #18
jim mcnamara said:
You seem to be in the US - most utiltities here allow cogeneration. Ask your power company. You can actually sell power back to the the "grid" and keep track of it with net metering

Sequentially starting large motors- ie. start #1 wait a minute, then start #2, etc. will decrease demand. But if you screw up just once, then increased demand charges will be in effect for the whole monthly billing period.
QUOTE]

Nation-wide net metering law was passed in the 2006 Energy Bill requiring all states to offer net metering. That's a great thing. However - the language was vague in how power providers must offer it.

For example - in North Carolina - a net metering agreement requires that you switch to a time-of-use plan. As you mentioned - screw up once - and you get stuck with that rate for the whole month. We calculated it out:

Spend $40,000 for a new, large PV system.
Turn on your oven, washer, dryer, some lights, the TV, the computer and the airconditioner around the same time. (not a far-fetched scenario by any means)
You may end up paying MORE for the month - even though you are using way less electricity for the month - than if you had never spent $40,000 on the PV - all because your peak usage during that 15 min. was used to calculate your rate.

Screwed up or what!??!

What is needed is a firm definition of what net metering is...

CH
 
  • #19
russ_watters said:
It is, but even when you include that, propane is still almost twice as expensive on a per btu basis.
Not according to http://www.propanecost.com/btu.php" .
$5.68/million BTU for propane
$5.00/million BTU for natural gas

EDIT: this was copyrighted in 2003
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #20
I've had the privilege of helping to look at how our company can save electrical costs. I can say with some certainty that the way electric bills are calculated is an order of magnitude more complicated than the systems used for cell phones and airline ticket pricing.
 
  • #21
FredGarvin said:
I've had the privilege of helping to look at how our company can save electrical costs. I can say with some certainty that the way electric bills are calculated is an order of magnitude more complicated than the systems used for cell phones and airline ticket pricing.

I didn't think that was possible! :smile:

CS
 
  • #22
dlgoff said:
Not according to http://www.propanecost.com/btu.php" .
$5.68/million BTU for propane
$5.00/million BTU for natural gas

EDIT: this was copyrighted in 2003
I think that may just be a sample calculation - none of the numbers look anywhere close to what the fuels actually cost (their propane number is one fifth what it actually costs!). I last did this calculation a year ago, but here are the numbers for my last months' propane bill:

$2.695/gal
91,000 BTU/gal (91 MBH)
$.0296/MBH

For natural gas, these prices may be wholesale, so if anyone has a bill, that would be helpful...
http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/oog/info/ngw/ngupdate.asp
$18/1,000,000 BTU
$.018/MBH

Difference: 65%

So perhaps not as bad as I thought - perhaps natural gas has been rising faster than propane: my propane is 15% more expensive this year than last.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #23
FredGarvin said:
I've had the privilege of helping to look at how our company can save electrical costs. I can say with some certainty that the way electric bills are calculated is an order of magnitude more complicated than the systems used for cell phones and airline ticket pricing.
I disagree: my dad makes a living by saving companies money on utility bills and at the very least, there are far fewer electric rate options. And those calculations take a short one-page Excel spreadsheet. He spends much more time on phones than electric rates.

Commercial electric bills work something like this:

Fixed per kW fee (somewhere around $12/kW)
Three tiers of kWh fees, something like 80*kW, the next 80*kW, and the rest. (these are broken down further into generation, distribution, and transition charges, but they are constant for each tier)
Various fixed fees

There are a variety of optional things, but virtually all of them reduce your bill, they don't increase it (such as time of day metering)

Now the thing about the demand is that not only does it make the per kWh charge higher (the first tier is more expensive than the third) and not only does it have its own fee associated with it, but the electric company uses your summer peak to set the minimum (usually 80%) for the rest of the year. So an extra kW of demand for a half an hour in the summer may cost you $100 or more.
 
Last edited:
  • #24
I'm at my parents' for brunch today - my dad paid $1.30/ccf last month for natural gas, so that's $.015/MBH -- and propane is a lot worse than it was before: 127% more expensive than gas. My dad was saying that natural gas has actually come down a little in the past year and propane tends to follow oil prices (since it is a derivative of oil).
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
20K