On the clockwise rotation of the reflection coefficient with frequency

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of the input reflection coefficient, ρ, of linear time-invariant (LTI) causal passive systems with respect to frequency, particularly focusing on the local clockwise rotation observed in its representation on a Smith chart. Participants explore the implications of this behavior for both lossless and lossy systems, seeking rigorous proof and references related to the phenomenon.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that the input reflection coefficient of LTI causal passive systems exhibits a local clockwise rotation with frequency, which is distinct from the derivative of the phase.
  • It is noted that for lossless systems, this behavior can be explained using Foster’s reactance theorem, but a rigorous proof for lossy systems is lacking.
  • Another participant expresses a similar search for proof and acknowledges a correction regarding the sign of inequalities in the equations presented.
  • A participant mentions an attempt to contact an author of a relevant paper, which focuses on a specific case involving microstrip antennas, but does not provide a general solution to the problem discussed.
  • There is a recognition that the referenced paper offers modifications to the Smith chart for microstrip circuits but does not draw general conclusions about the reflection coefficient's behavior in frequency.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the observation of clockwise rotation in the reflection coefficient with frequency, but there is no consensus on the existence of a rigorous proof for lossy systems, and multiple views on the applicability of existing literature remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in the literature regarding the generality of findings, particularly concerning the lack of rigorous proofs for lossy systems and the specificity of existing studies to particular cases.

WhiteHaired
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
It is well known that the evolution of the input reflection coefficient, ρ, of a LTI causal passive system with frequency, f, always presents a local clockwise rotation when plotted in cartesian axes (Re(ρ), Im(ρ)), e.g. in a Smith chart, as shown in the attached figure.

It must appointed that the local clockwise rotation should not be confused with the derivative of the phase with frequency, which is always negative when the curve encompasses the center of the Smith chart, but it may be positive otherwise (e.g. in a resonant series RLC circuit with R>Z0, where Z0 is the port characteristic impedance). The question here concerns the local rotation, which is always clockwise.

For lossless systems, it may be explained from the Foster’s reactance theorem, “The imaginary immittance of a passive, lossless one-port monotonically increases with frequency”, which has been demonstrated in different ways in literature.

However I couldn’t find any rigorous proof for lossy systems. Books and manuscripts always reference the lossless case and the Foster’s theorem.

Do you know any reference?

In geometry, for a plane curve given parametrically in Cartesian coordinates as (x(f),y(f)), the signed curvature, k, is

k=\frac{x'y''-y'x''}{(x^{2}+y^{2})^{3/2}}

where primes refer to derivatives with respect to frequency f. A negative value means that the curve is clockwise. Therefore, the reflection coefficient of a LTI causal passive system with frequency, f, has always a negative curvature when plotted in Cartesian coordinates (Re(ρ), Im(ρ)), i.e., it satisfies:

\frac{∂Im(ρ)}{∂f}\frac{∂^{2}Re(ρ)}{∂f^{2}}>\frac{∂Re(ρ)}{∂f}\frac{∂^{2}Im(ρ)}{∂f^{2}}

or, equivalently,

\frac{∂}{∂f}\left[\frac{\frac{∂Im(ρ)}{∂f}}{\frac{∂Re(ρ)}{∂f}}\right]>0→\frac{∂}{∂f}\left(\frac{∂Im(ρ)}{∂Re(ρ)}\right)>0

Is this right?
Is there any theorem or property of LTI causal systems from which one may conclude this?
Kramer-Kronig relations or Hilbert transform?
I would appreciate your help on this.
 

Attachments

  • Smith.jpg
    Smith.jpg
    37.8 KB · Views: 612
Science news on Phys.org
Hi.
Did you find any proof? I'm also looking for that.

Thanks.
 
Hi Avihai.
I looked for it in many fundamental books of physics and electromagnetism, but I couldn't find any proof.
Please note that the sign of the inequalities in my last equations is changed. It should read < 0.

Any suggestion?

Thanks.
 
Unfortunately I have no suggestions.
I tried to contact Settapong Malisuwan who published a paper concerning a frequency dependent smith chart, but only concerning a microstrip antenna, so for now it is only a private case and not a general. So it is not good enough answer to our problem.
For now, I have no response from him.
this is the paper:
http://www.ijcce.org/papers/262-OC0032.pdf
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thank you Avihai. Very interesting the paper from Dr. Malisuwan et al., but, as you said, it's not a general case. They found a useful modification of the Smith chart representation for microstrip circuits, but no general conclussions about the behaviour of the reflection coefficient in frequency when represented in polar coordinates are drawn.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 121 ·
5
Replies
121
Views
25K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K