On the domain of the function that undergoes the Hilbert transform

AI Thread Summary
The Hilbert transform is indeed classified as an integral transform, despite both the input and output functions being defined over the same domain. This characteristic is coincidental and does not negate its classification as an integral transform. The discussion highlights the similarity to the Fourier transform, where input and output functions exist in different domains. Participants agree on the integral transform nature of the Hilbert transform, providing references for further clarification. Overall, the Hilbert transform maintains its status as an integral transform within mathematical frameworks.
elgen
Messages
63
Reaction score
5
Hi all,

This question is on the Hilbert transform, particularly on the domain of the input and output functions of the Hilbert transform.

Before rising the question, consider the Fourier transform. The input is f(t) and the output is F(\omega). The function f and F are defined over different domains, t and \omega respectively.

For the Hilbert transform, the input is f(t) and the output is \hat{f}(t). Both the input and output functions are defined over the same domain. This seems to be inconsistent with the defintion of an integral transform.

The question is "would the Hilbert transform be an integral tranform?". My feeling is that the Hilbert transform IS an integral transform. It is a coincidance that the domain of the input function is the same as the domain of the output function. Some assurance is appreciated.

Thank you for the attention.


elgen
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Thank you.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top