On the orthogonality of the rotation matrix

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the orthogonality of rotation matrices, specifically how the invariance of vector length under rotation implies that the rotation matrix satisfies the relation R_{ij} R_{ik} = δ_{jk}. It is established that if this condition holds, the length of a vector remains unchanged. The necessity of this condition is explored by considering the squared lengths of arbitrary vectors and their rotations. The conclusion drawn is that the orthogonality condition must hold for all vectors, leading to the matrix notation R^T R = I, where I is the identity matrix. This confirms the fundamental property of rotation matrices in preserving vector lengths.
brotherbobby
Messages
755
Reaction score
170
Homework Statement
Show how the rotation matrix is orthogonal in three dimensional Euclidean space ##E_3## when it acts on vectors. Remember that rotation should preserve the length of the vector.
Relevant Equations
If the vector ##\mathbf x = x_i \hat e_i## is acted on by a rotation matrix ##\mathbb {R}##, we obtain a different (rotated) vector ##\mathbf x' = x'_i \hat e_i##, where ##\boxed{x'_i = R_{ij} x_j}##, ##R_{ij}##'s being the components of the rotation matrix ##\mathbb {R}##.

The length of a vector ##|\mathbf{x}|^2 = x_i x_i##.
Let me start with the rotated vector components : ##x'_i = R_{ij} x_j##. The length of the rotated vector squared : ##x'_i x'_i = R_{ij} x_j R_{ik} x_k##. For this (squared) length to be invariant, we must have ##R_{ij} x_j R_{ik} x_k = R_{ij} R_{ik} x_j x_k = x_l x_l##.

If the rotation matrix components supported the relation ##\boxed{R_{ij} R_{ik} = \delta_{jk}}##, we find that the above equation would hold good, ##l## being a dummy variable which can be replaced by ##j## or ##k##.

However, I have proved sufficiency : Given that ##R_{ij} R_{ik} = \delta_{jk}##, the length of a vector remains unchanged.

I am stuck as to the necessity : If the length of a vector is given to be unchanged, show how ##\boxed{R_{ij} R_{ik} = \delta_{jk}}##.

A help as to prove the necessary condition would be welcome.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
brotherbobby said:
we must have ##R_{ij} x_j R_{ik} x_k = R_{ij} R_{ik} x_j x_k = x_l x_l##.

And, e.g., ##x_l = \delta_{jl} x_j##.
 
For necessity note that the condition that ##\vec{x}^2## is unschanged must hold for all vectors ##\vec{x}##. What can you conclude for ##(\vec{x}+\vec{y})^2## where ##\vec{x}## and ##\vec{y}## are arbitrary vectors?
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
vanhees71 said:
For necessity note that the condition that ##\vec{x}^2## is unschanged must hold for all vectors ##\vec{x}##. What can you conclude for ##(\vec{x}+\vec{y})^2## where ##\vec{x}## and ##\vec{y}## are arbitrary vectors?

Let me write out the equations as you put it.

As the arbitrary vector ##\vec x## would have its (squared) length unchanged, we can say that ##\left( \vec x + \vec y \right)^2 = \left( \vec x + \vec y \right)^2 = \left( \vec x' + \vec y' \right)^2 = \left( \rm R \vec x + \rm R \vec y \right)^2 \Rightarrow \vec x^2 + \vec y^2 + 2 \vec x \cdot \vec y = (\rm R \vec x)^2 + (\rm R \vec y)^2 + 2 R_{ij} R_{ik} x_i x_j##.

For this to be valid, seeing the last term, we have ##\boxed{R_{ij} R_{ik} = \delta_{jk}}##.

Thank you very much.

Please let me know if I have been correct when you have the time.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Of course the last term in your long equation should be ##2 R_{ij} R_{ik} x_i y_j##. Then, since ##(R \vec{x})^2=\vec{x}^2## and ##(R\vec{y})^2=\vec{y}^2## you have from your equation necessarily ##R_{ij} R_{ik} x_j y_k=\delta_{jk} x_j x_k## which means, since this has to hold for any ##\vec{x}## and ##\vec{y}## that ##R_{ij} R_{ik}=\delta_{jk}##. In matrix notation this reads ##R^{\text{T}} R=1##, where ##R^{\text{T}}## is the transposed matrix, i.e., writing the columns of ##R## as the rows of ##R^{\text{T}}##.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K