Understanding Tensor Gradients in R3

  • Thread starter Thread starter EsmeeDijk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gradient Tensor
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the gradient of an orthogonal tensor in R3, specifically the expression \(\nabla _j t_{ij}(x)\) and the condition \(\epsilon _{ijk} \nabla _i t_{jk}(x) = 0\). The tensor is defined as \(t_{ij}(x^2) = a(x^2) x_i x_j + b(x^2) \delta_{ij} x^2 + c(x^2) \epsilon_{ijk} x_k\). Participants express confusion regarding the notation and the assumptions made in the equations, particularly concerning the dependency of the tensor components on the variables \(x_i\) and \(x_j\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor calculus in R3
  • Familiarity with gradient operations and tensor notation
  • Knowledge of Levi-Civita symbols and their properties
  • Experience with mathematical notation and transformations in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of orthogonal tensors in R3
  • Learn about gradient operations on tensor fields
  • Explore the implications of Levi-Civita symbols in tensor calculus
  • Review the application of tensors in physics, particularly in continuum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineering students focusing on tensor analysis and its applications in fields such as continuum mechanics and differential geometry.

EsmeeDijk
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We have the following orthogonal tensor in R3:
t_{ij} (x^2) = a (x^2) x_i x_j + b(x^2) \delta _{ij} x^2 + c(x^2) \epsilon_ {ijk} x_k
Calculate the following quantities and simplify your expression as much as possible:
\nabla _j t_{ij}(x)
and
\epsilon _{ijk} \nabla _i t_{jk}(x) = 0​

Homework Equations


The equations given in my book are:
(\nabla f)_i = \Lambda _{ji} \frac{\partial f}{\partial x_j} ( with a tilda on the last xj
\nabla _i = \Lambda_i^j \nabla _j (with a tilda "~" on the last nabla)

The Attempt at a Solution


My problem is that these equations that I have are all assuming that you have a tensor in the form of a matrix, but this is not the case I believe. Also in the book leading up to these equations you have a vector x which is dependent on xi and on ei. Which is now also not the case. Only the first term with a is dependent on xi or xj, but I can't imagine that the rest of the function just falls away..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your notation is unfamiliar.
What do ##x,x^2## and ##x_i## represent in your formula?
Does ##t_{ij}(x^2)## represent the ##i,j## component of the tensor, in some assumed (but unstated) basis, calculated in terms of a parameter ##x^2##? Or does it represent the application of an order-2 tensor to a vector denoted by the symbol ##x^2##?
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K