One dimensional motion- object accelerating straight downwards

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving a rocket accelerating downwards from a building. The rocket's acceleration is defined as a(t) = βt, indicating it is not constant. Participants highlight the importance of correctly applying equations of motion, noting that the standard formula for constant acceleration is inappropriate here. One user realizes the need to integrate to find the position function instead of using the initial equation. The conversation emphasizes the necessity of understanding the nature of acceleration in solving motion problems.
texan14
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
One dimensional motion-- object accelerating straight downwards

Homework Statement



A rocket, initially at rest, is fired at "t = 0" vertically down from a building of height "H". The rocket's acceleration, including the effects of gravity, is downwards with increasing magnitude given by a(t) = βt, where "β" is a known constant. When does it hit the ground and how fast is it going when it hits?

Homework Equations



xf = xi + vi*t + (1/2)*a*t2

The Attempt at a Solution



xf = (0) + vi*t + (1/2)*β*t2

I plugged everything into this equation, but it doesn't look right. I'm really confused. thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Hi Texan14,

Is the acceleration constant? If not, why do you want to use the formula for constant acceleration?

Go back to the definition of acceleration.

ehild
 


I decided to integrate until I got the position function and solved for "t" and just plugged that into v(t). Thank you for your help, I don't know why I wanted to use that equation! haha
 


It does not hurt to read the the problem before plugging in everything to everywhere...:-p

ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top