Open bottom aquarium glass question

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Kamto
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Aquarium Glass
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the construction of an open bottom aquarium, also referred to as an inverted aquarium or romaurie effect. Participants explore the feasibility of using thinner glass for this type of aquarium and discuss various design considerations, including structural integrity and air management within the aquarium.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Kamto inquires whether thinner glass can be used for the aquarium and asks for any applicable formulas.
  • One participant states that the pressure difference remains the same, but the direction of pressure could pose a problem if the glass fixation is designed for higher internal pressure.
  • Another participant suggests that the bottom glass may require external support, indicating potential structural concerns.
  • Kamto shares their experience with a previous aquarium, mentioning that the top glass caved in during an attempt to create a vacuum, leading to the addition of a glass bar for support.
  • There is a suggestion that the glass should be glued to the outside of the frame for better sealing properties.
  • A participant proposes decorative beading and mentions the potential for bubbles at the top of the aquarium, suggesting aeration could complicate the bubble situation.
  • Kamto confirms the installation of an air suction system but expresses confusion about the concept of an "upside down siphon." Another participant elaborates on this idea, describing a method involving a tube to manage air bubbles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various concerns and suggestions regarding the structural integrity and air management of the aquarium, indicating that multiple competing views remain without a clear consensus on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the implications of pressure differences and structural support without resolving the specific requirements for glass thickness or design. The conversation includes assumptions about the aquarium's construction and the effectiveness of proposed solutions.

Kamto
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello All, I am new to this forum and would like to introduce my self as well as having question that has been in my mind for a while now. Please call me Kamto :o) I am not physicist so please forgive me if I am not knowing much about physics. Ok here is my question:

I am planing of making an open bottom aquarium or inverted aquarium or romaurie effect (which evername we might call it, it's the same thing) It's the same principle as if we put water in the glass about 3 quarter, and cover the top of the glass with a piece of paper, then put it up side down and the water does not fall off. In this case the glass is the aquarium. However, instead we cover the bottom of the aquarium with paper, we put the aquarium on the water surface of a pond. If you are interested, please look up on you tube or the net. There are many sites of them.

My question is: Can we use thinner glass than regular aquarium glass to build such an aquarium. If we can, is there any formula I can use. Thank you so much in advance for your help.
Kamto
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kamto said:
My question is: Can we use thinner glass than regular aquarium glass to build such an aquarium. If we can, is there any formula I can use. Thank you so much in advance for your help.
No, the pressure difference is the same. But the direction is opposite, and that might be a problem if the glass fixation to the frame is only designed to withstand higher pressure on the inside. The glass might fall out of the frame into the aquarium.
 
Could also be a problem for the "bottom" if it was intended to have external support.
 
Ok :o) Thank you so much A.T and Russ_Watters for the quick replys. Yess, the top glass caved down on me, the first time I tried to pull the air out. So I reglued it back and put a glass bar (5cm x 50cm, with 6mm in thickness) in the middle of the top glass panel and it worked. It's been running for about 4 months now. However, I am planning to make a bigger one. The one I have now is 100cm long x 50cm wide x 40cm tall and all used 6 mm thick glass except for the bottom glass that support the whole aquarium.For the support the 8 mm is used. I am planning to make 200cm long x 100cm wide x 150cm tall.

Thank you for your info A.T and Russ :o) I think it's time to be working on this. :o) cheers
 
Kamto said:
Ok :o) Thank you so much A.T and Russ_Watters for the quick replys. Yess, the top glass caved down on me, the first time I tried to pull the air out. So I reglued it back and put a glass bar (5cm x 50cm, with 6mm in thickness) in the middle of the top glass panel and it worked. It's been running for about 4 months now. However, I am planning to make a bigger one. The one I have now is 100cm long x 50cm wide x 40cm tall and all used 6 mm thick glass except for the bottom glass that support the whole aquarium.For the support the 8 mm is used. I am planning to make 200cm long x 100cm wide x 150cm tall.

Thank you for your info A.T and Russ :o) I think it's time to be working on this. :o) cheers

Did you pick up on the point that the glass should be glued to the outside of the frame and not to the inside? That could make a huge difference to the sealing properties of the joins.
 
Sorry for taking me sometimes to reply. Yes sophiecentaur, I've thought about that. Thank you for assuring me. Now I just have to think of how to make it looks neat. :o)
 
Some extra decorative beading around the outside, perhaps.
You can expect quite a lot of bubbles at the top of this upside down aquarium. Presumably you are going to aerate the water - which will be good for the fish but not good for the bubble situation. If you could drill a hole in the top, you could remove the air through it using a syringe. Or a sort of upside down siphon could also work, once you prime it. Nice little problem for you to solve.
Enjoy.
 
Thank you again sophiecentaur for yor reply.I am sorry I just write back now. Yes, I did made a hole for the air sucktion system. However, I have no idea of the " upside down siphon". Does this mean the water outside the tank is sucked into the tank?
 
Kamto said:
Thank you again sophiecentaur for yor reply.I am sorry I just write back now. Yes, I did made a hole for the air sucktion system. However, I have no idea of the " upside down siphon". Does this mean the water outside the tank is sucked into the tank?
Long time since I though t about this and I'm not exactly sure what I meant at the time. Pity you didn't challenge me at the time haha, I might have been able to justify it. I think my idea involved a long tube down to the floor (into a bucket), full of water, extending up to the highest point in the invert space with the air in it. Water should flow down this (as long as the bucket level is well below the level in the trough and, if the tube is narrow enough, it should sweep air bubbles down in with it. Perhaps even a pump could do this. It would be good it it could work without your intervention.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
16K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K