Open Strings, D-Branes, and Conservation of Energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter Keys
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Strings
Keys
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Can someone please explain to me why string theories with open strings must also have closed strings? I've read it is due to conservation of energy, an open string not attached to a closed string will lose it's energy off an end. Does this mean all D-branes must be made from closed strings? I can easily imagine open strings attached to each other in a manner which does not allow loose ends and doesn't require closed strings.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Keys said:
Can someone please explain to me why string theories with open strings must also have closed strings?
An easy (though far from rigorous) way to see this is as follows:
A one-loop open-string diagram is topologically the same as a tree closed-string diagram. Try to convince yourself by drawing it!
 
OK, if they look the same, then they are considered equivalent? What's the point in specifying then? This leads to my 2nd question, if a one loop open string is attached to a d-brane, I've read it cannot be detached. But if we can just relabel it a tree closed string, then it is detachable? Thanks.
 
This is an alert about a claim regarding the standard model, that got a burst of attention in the past two weeks. The original paper came out last year: "The electroweak η_W meson" by Gia Dvali, Archil Kobakhidze, Otari Sakhelashvili (2024) The recent follow-up and other responses are "η_W-meson from topological properties of the electroweak vacuum" by Dvali et al "Hiding in Plain Sight, the electroweak η_W" by Giacomo Cacciapaglia, Francesco Sannino, Jessica Turner "Astrophysical...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top