Open Strings, D-Branes, and Conservation of Energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter Keys
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Strings
Keys
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Can someone please explain to me why string theories with open strings must also have closed strings? I've read it is due to conservation of energy, an open string not attached to a closed string will lose it's energy off an end. Does this mean all D-branes must be made from closed strings? I can easily imagine open strings attached to each other in a manner which does not allow loose ends and doesn't require closed strings.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Keys said:
Can someone please explain to me why string theories with open strings must also have closed strings?
An easy (though far from rigorous) way to see this is as follows:
A one-loop open-string diagram is topologically the same as a tree closed-string diagram. Try to convince yourself by drawing it!
 
OK, if they look the same, then they are considered equivalent? What's the point in specifying then? This leads to my 2nd question, if a one loop open string is attached to a d-brane, I've read it cannot be detached. But if we can just relabel it a tree closed string, then it is detachable? Thanks.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top