Open subspace of a compact space topological space

AI Thread Summary
In topology, while a closed subspace of a compact space is always compact, an open subspace is not necessarily compact. The discussion highlights a proof attempt suggesting that an open subspace G of a compact space X is compact, but this is incorrect. The counterexample provided is the open interval (0,1) within the compact space [0,1], which illustrates that an open cover of G may not have a finite subcover. Thus, the conclusion is that open subspaces of compact spaces do not retain compactness.
de_brook
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
It is a fact that if X is a compact topoloical space then a closed subspace of X is compact.
Is an open subspace G of X also compact?
please consider the following and note if i am wrong;

proof: Since G is open then the relative topology on G is class {H_i}of open subset of X such that the union of all sets in this class is G. but X is compact and each H_i is the intersection of G with an open subset P_i of X for corresponding i. The result follows from the fact {p_i} has a finite subclass which contains X.
hence every open subspace of a compact space is compact.

pls, am i right?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your proof is wrong, as you can have an open cover of G in the topology of X that doesn't cover X, and then when you reduce it to the induced topology on G it doesn't need to have a finite subcover.

Conclusion: All you did is prove that an open cover of a compact space is also an open cover of its subsets (not a very impressive result :p )

As a quick counterexample, see (0,1) contained in [0,1]
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top