Schools Is the Open University Degree in Physics/Maths-Physics Worth It for Hobbyists?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RahSuh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Degree University
AI Thread Summary
The Open University degree in Physics or Maths/Physics is viewed positively for hobbyists, offering a well-structured curriculum that balances rigor and accessibility. The courses are praised for their clear organization, comprehensive textbooks, and effective teaching methods, making them suitable for those with prior knowledge. Time commitments are significant, with 30-credit modules requiring 8-10 hours per week and 60-credit modules needing 16-20 hours, suggesting a full-time course demands at least 32 hours weekly. While most courses are primarily distance learning, some in-person attendance for labs and tutorials is necessary. Overall, the degree is recommended for those looking to engage with physics academically without pursuing a full-time career in the field.
RahSuh
Messages
10
Reaction score
4
Hi

Strange question but here goes

I am thinking of doing the Open University degree in Physics or Maths/Physics and wondered if anyone had done it and had any thoughts

By way of background I actually did physics undergrad degree over 25 years ago (gosh!) here in the UK. But like a lot of people, I got bored with physics and then went into finance here in the UK. And totally forgot about physics. However, in the last few years, I have got very interested in it again.

In fact have been steadily working my way through Prof Susskinds Theoretical Min series - which are refreshing, unique and perfectly aimed at me (ie someone with rusty physics but someone who knows what what differential eqns are etc.)

I hadn't thought about physics for 25 years but it came back to me after a few hours/weeks of studying. It is startling how much of ones knowledge just sits there in one's mental hard drive - ready to be taken out and reused. You forget the details, but the principles are still there. In fact, I know understand the bits of physics I have studied now better than when I was a (lazy!) under- grad

Even though there are lots of physics resources out there - they are unstructured for an interested amateur like me. Some are too complicated, some are too easy and some don't have a logical structure that a university degree offers (ie at uni - they teach you the easy stuff first, then the not so easy stuff, making sure you study in logical order)

So for me - the degree would purely be a hobby ( I am not going to quit work/ have no intention of doing PhD/ or of being a fulltime physicist) It is purely to keep my mind active and sharp.

What I wanted to know:

- Is the course well structured
- Is the material interesting
- Teaching methods actually update / fresh
- The time commitment involved?

Appreciate any thoughts
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't done a degree with the OU, but I'm studying two standalone modules (MST326 and MST210). Previous to this I have a masters degree in chemical engineering and another one in membrane engineering.

I think the courses are excellent. Compared to courses on my other degrees, often put together by a researcher who is mainly interested in his research and not course design/pedagogy, the courses are very rigorous and well organised. Both textbooks are very well written on the whole, and come with a handbook, the first half of which contains pre-requisite knowledge summaries and all the things your likely to need (standard integrals, summaries of mathematical techniques etc), while the latter half contains summaries of each unit. Also expect very good cross-referencing both within a module and between modules (e.g. in MST326 it'll say 'we can solve this PDE using separation of variables, (See MST210 Unit X, Page XX)).

Regarding time commitment, the individual modules have a guideline as to how much study time is required. I would normally suggest taking the upper limits as a guideline, as I would expect the lower limits to be if you want to pass, rather than get a distinction. However, with your previous studies, this might not apply, and you may want to go by the lower limit. From what I know, a 30 credit module requires 8-10 hours a week, while a 60 credit module requires 16-20 hours a week. A full-time course would have 120 credits, so expect a minimum of 32 hours study a week.

Overall, I strongly recommend.
 
  • Like
Likes Nidum
General experience of many people is that OU courses are excellent .

Please note though that the courses are not all based entirely on distance learning and private study .

Most of the courses in scientific and engineering subjects require the student to attend in person at the OU campus for labs , intensive courses and some tutorials .
 
Nidum said:
Please note though that the courses are not all based entirely on distance learning and private study .

Most of the courses in scientific and engineering subjects require the student to attend in person at the OU campus for labs , intensive courses and some tutorials .

That used to be the case, but most residential courses were scrapped a few years ago.
 
FluidStu said:
I haven't done a degree with the OU, but I'm studying two standalone modules (MST326 and MST210). Previous to this I have a masters degree in chemical engineering and another one in membrane engineering.

I think the courses are excellent. Compared to courses on my other degrees, often put together by a researcher who is mainly interested in his research and not course design/pedagogy, the courses are very rigorous and well organised. Both textbooks are very well written on the whole, and come with a handbook, the first half of which contains pre-requisite knowledge summaries and all the things your likely to need (standard integrals, summaries of mathematical techniques etc), while the latter half contains summaries of each unit. Also expect very good cross-referencing both within a module and between modules (e.g. in MST326 it'll say 'we can solve this PDE using separation of variables, (See MST210 Unit X, Page XX)).

Regarding time commitment, the individual modules have a guideline as to how much study time is required. I would normally suggest taking the upper limits as a guideline, as I would expect the lower limits to be if you want to pass, rather than get a distinction. However, with your previous studies, this might not apply, and you may want to go by the lower limit. From what I know, a 30 credit module requires 8-10 hours a week, while a 60 credit module requires 16-20 hours a week. A full-time course would have 120 credits, so expect a minimum of 32 hours study a week.

Overall, I strongly recommend.
Hi - many thanks for the feedback. Much appreciated. I am very very tempted to do the course. Its a question of time commitment to see it through. I will have to think about that hard. Take care.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?
Back
Top