Operator in non-orthogonal basis

  • Thread starter Thread starter j_dirac
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis Operator
j_dirac
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi, is possible make up a operator in a non-orthogonal basis, if is possible how I can contruct the operator.

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
why not form your operators as |b><a|
 
which are the consequence of choice a basis non-orthogonal?
 
j_dirac said:
which are the consequence of choice a basis non-orthogonal?

Why do you want to form an operator in a non-orthogonal basis in the first place?
 
j_dirac said:
Hi, is possible make up a operator in a non-orthogonal basis, if is possible how I can contruct the operator.

thanks

Of course.

All you need to know is the effect of the operator on all the basis states. So if you know all the values of &lt;a_i|A|a_j&gt; then you know everything about the operator.

Alternatively, as quetzalcoatl9 pointed out, an arbitrary operators can be written as

A = \sum c_{ij} |a_i&gt;&lt;a_j|

One consequence of having a non orthonogonal basis is that you can't read off directly from the above expression what is the effect of applying the operator to a basis state gives.

If the basis is orthogonal, then applying A to, say, |a_3&gt; will simply give c_{13} |a_1&gt; + c_{23} |a_2&gt; + \ldots (I am assuming that the labels of the states are discrete and start at 1). If the basis is not orthogonal, the expression is of course more complicated.
 
I can construct a basis depent of basis non-orthogonal, how might make up? and what happen with the eigenvalues and elements of the operator.

someone know if the situation present in some quantum system.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top