Operator representation of p in x basis.

qubits
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
For the Schrodinger equation for a hydrogen atom, we need to write out:

p^2/2m for the electron.

If we define our basis states to be a linear discrete array of points, let's say 4 points. 0,d,2d, and 3d, where is some distance, on the order of a Bohr radius. How do I write p as an operator in that positional basis? I kind of have an idea of how to do it, but I don't want to say anything to bias your answers. I'll hear your ideas then tell you what I did.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Basically I want to write this in operator notation where I have defined the basis states.

\hat{H} = \frac{1}{2m} \hat{p}_{1}^2 - \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{Z e}{\hat{r}_{1} - R}
 


In the x basis, the position operator is represented as x, which acts on a wavefunction ψ(x) to give the position of the particle. In the same way, the momentum operator p is represented as p = -iħ(d/dx), which acts on ψ(x) to give the momentum of the particle.

To represent p in the given basis of 0,d,2d, and 3d, we can use the position operator x to define the basis states as |0⟩, |d⟩, |2d⟩, and |3d⟩. Then, we can write p as an operator in this basis as follows:

p = -iħ(d/dx) = -iħ((d/d0)|0⟩ + (d/dd)|d⟩ + (d/d2d)|2d⟩ + (d/d3d)|3d⟩)

= -iħ(0|0⟩ + (1/d)|d⟩ + (2/d)|2d⟩ + (3/d)|3d⟩)

= -iħ(d/d)∑n=0^3 n|nd⟩

where |nd⟩ represents the basis state at position nd.

This representation of p in the given basis shows that the momentum operator is a linear combination of the position basis states, with coefficients proportional to the distances d. This approach can be extended to any discrete basis of points, allowing for the representation of p in different bases for different systems.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Back
Top