Opposing Moments on Levered Beam

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
nickbarker77
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate the force F1 to bend the beam AB to a radius of 7.5m. Assume the beam is a steel tube 200mm OD with wall thickness 20mm. The arm's AC and BD can be assumed rigid.

The force F1 acts on pivots at C and D and is always in the x direction.

Homework Equations



I = pi (do4 - di4) / 64



The Attempt at a Solution



My first thought was to assume the beam was fixed at one end and then work out the deflection required to achieve a a radius of 7.5m. From this I substituted into the deflection formula to work out a point load need on the end of the cantilevered beam to produce the deflection.

I think i should be calculating the moment at point C and D but I'm struggling a bit, any help would be greatly appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20120322_193451.jpg
    IMG_20120322_193451.jpg
    13 KB · Views: 648
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks rock.freak667.

i have since found this formula and came out with an answer of 1.25 x 10^6 N/m for the moment required.

this is using a value of 4.637 x 10^-5 for the second moment of area and a young's modulus of 200GPa for the steel.

As the arms at the end of the beam are 1.25m long then the required force at points C and D would be 9.9 x 10^5 N.

This seem a little high?
 
When I calculated the second moment of area I got 2.701*10^-5 m^4 based on this:
[itex]I=\frac{\pi*\left[\left(200mm\right)^{4}-\left(200mm-20mm\right)^{4}\right]}{64}=2.701\times10^{-5}m^{4}[/itex]

This would change your results a little bit. Solving out the ratio before of M/I = E/R gives:

[itex]\frac{M}{I}=\frac{E}{R}[/itex]

[itex]M=\frac{EI}{R}[/itex]

[itex]M=1.441\times10^{5}N[/itex]

I would definitely double check what I did. 32,394 pounds of force seems reasonable to me though.