Optimization Problem with an RC BP filter

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on designing an RC bandpass filter that peaks at 10kHz while maintaining less than half peak voltage at 3kHz and 30kHz. The user is struggling with the optimization of component values, specifically resistors and capacitors, and is advised to use more sophisticated tools like R or Matlab instead of spreadsheets for better efficiency. Dimensional analysis of the transfer function reveals inconsistencies, prompting a reevaluation of the formula's correctness. The conversation also highlights the importance of approximating the behavior of the filter stages, suggesting that the impedance relationships between components are crucial for achieving the desired frequency response. Ultimately, the user is encouraged to refine their approach to selecting component values based on the filter's characteristics and performance requirements.
  • #91
The Electrician said:
Here's the un-normalized response of your original circuit using the R and C values I gave in post #25:
Have you determined the Q with those component values?

There's a formula relating Q to the -3dB bandwidth, but do you know any general formula relating Q to the -6dB bandwidth? (The task here specifies the -6dB bandwidth, approximately.)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #92
donpacino said:
when analyzing the circuit, the transfer function is found seen below

Vo/Vin = [SC_2R_2 ] / [ S^2C_2^2R_2_2+S(2C_2R_2+C1R1)+1 ]
I have been wanting to reconcile this equation with the plot in #25. Is there an error in this apart from the subscript?

The plot in #25 seems to be exhibiting a Q of around 0.5 or so. (10,000÷19,000) [EDIT: correction]
With the Rs and Cs suggested, I calculate using your equation: Q = 0.333

There needs to be agreement in these figures before developing this further.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes donpacino
  • #93
donpacino in post #32 has the wrong transfer function. The pdf file in post #60 has the derivation of the correct transfer function.

My derivation is the same:

PBP4.png
 
  • #94
The Electrician said:
donpacino in post #32 has the wrong transfer function. The pdf file in post #60 has the derivation of the correct transfer function.

My derivation is the same:

View attachment 106821
Just checked my work. Yes it is incorrect. I now got what the electrcian got. I switched some terms part way through the analysis. 1 am algebra will do that I guess.

the take away: always sanity check your work. In retrospect my answer makes no sense.
 
  • #95
Well, it seems as thought it was merely meant to be a struggle. It wasn't supposed to work, and when I went back, we started messing with bridge filters. Somewhat cruel, but I suppose it was meant to teach us a lesson we won't soon forget LOL.
 
  • #96
Are you saying that your professor is showing you a bridge filter, with only Rs and Cs that will meet the requirements? Or are you saying that your professor expected that you would not be able to meet the requirements with only Rs and Cs?

Did you show your professor that the requirements can be met by the 4 stage R/C filter I showed you?
 
Last edited:
  • #97
NascentOxygen said:
With the Rs and Cs suggested, I calculate using your equation: Q = 0.333
The figure of 0.33 does seem lower than what I would expect to be achievable.

I added a capacitor parallel to R2 and my calculations (if correct) indicate this can realize a Q of approx 0.88. But I have yet to dertermine whether this would be sufficient to meet this task's specifications.
 
  • #98
I'm saying that we moved directly into discussing bridge filters. I suggested a 4 stage filter, and he said that should work, but that was all the further the conversation went.
 
  • #99
Maybe my simple engineering approach would not satisfy your examiner. However, a simple approach is to draw a phasor diagram for a series circuit consisting of C and R. It is easy to see that if Xc is half R, then the voltage across C is a bit less than half the applied voltage. This is the desired condition.
The high and low circuits are so far removed that interaction will be negligible.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K