Optimizing Chemical Z Production: $320K Budget

  • Thread starter Thread starter andyk23
  • Start date Start date
andyk23
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
A chemical manufacturing plant can produce z units of chemical Z given p units of chemical P and r units of chemical R, where:

z=90 p^.5 r^0.5

Chemical P costs $400 a unit and chemical R costs $3,200 a unit. The company wants to produce as many units of chemical Z as possible with a total budget of $320,000.

First thing I did was find the constraint being 400p+3200r=320,000, then solved for p=800-8r
plugged that into the first eqn z=90(800-8r)^.5*r^.5
Then I got z=1800(2r)^.5-720r, took the derivative z'=(1800/(2r^.5))-720 set it equal to zero and solved for r. I got r=25/4
then plugged that into the eqn to solve for p, 400p+3200(25/4)=320,000, p=758.
Plugged both of those into the original eqn to find z=90(758)^.5*(25/4)^.5=6194.65...
Somewhere I'm wrong, not quite sure any guidance would help. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
andyk23 said:
A chemical manufacturing plant can produce z units of chemical Z given p units of chemical P and r units of chemical R, where:

z=90 p^.5 r^0.5

Chemical P costs $400 a unit and chemical R costs $3,200 a unit. The company wants to produce as many units of chemical Z as possible with a total budget of $320,000.

First thing I did was find the constraint being 400p+3200r=320,000, then solved for p=800-8r
plugged that into the first eqn z=90(800-8r)^.5*r^.5
Then I got z=1800(2r)^.5-720r, took the derivative z'=(1800/(2r^.5))-720 set it equal to zero and solved for r. I got r=25/4
then plugged that into the eqn to solve for p, 400p+3200(25/4)=320,000, p=758.
Plugged both of those into the original eqn to find z=90(758)^.5*(25/4)^.5=6194.65...
Somewhere I'm wrong, not quite sure any guidance would help. Thanks

Your equation z = 90\sqrt{r} \sqrt{800-8r} is correct, but your equation z = 1800 \sqrt{2r}-720r is incorrect. I cannot imagine how how got the second equation, or why you would think it is valid. Certainly, you don't need it: the first equation is perfectly OK for finding the optimum. Although you say you are not quite sure any guidance would help, I am offering it anyway.

RGV
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
10K
Back
Top