Optimizing Orbital Trajectories for Efficient Mars Encounter

  • Thread starter Thread starter olyviab
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Astronomy Orbits
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on optimizing a space probe's trajectory to encounter Mars while minimizing fuel expenditure. It clarifies that if the velocity change intended for a Hohmann transfer is mistakenly applied radially outward, the probe will not reach Mars. The Hohmann transfer is identified as the least energy path for such an encounter. Participants discuss how to calculate the semi-major axis using the new velocity and radius after the velocity change. The conversation concludes with appreciation for the guidance provided.
olyviab
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
A space probe initially moving in a 1 AU circular orbit around the sun (i.e. moving with the earth). The aim is to put this space probe in an orbit that will encounter Mars, using the least possible expenditure of rocket fuel (energy). This orbit, it turns out, is one in which perihelion (closest approach to the sun) is at the Earth's orbit (r=1AU), and aphelion (furthest approach from the sun) is at Mars' orbit.Suppose that the rockets had fired so that the change in velocity was in the radial direction (outwards). Calculate a (semi major axis) Will this orbit ever reach Mars?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
olyviab said:
A space probe initially moving in a 1 AU circular orbit around the sun (i.e. moving with the earth). The aim is to put this space probe in an orbit that will encounter Mars, using the least possible expenditure of rocket fuel (energy). This orbit, it turns out, is one in which perihelion (closest approach to the sun) is at the Earth's orbit (r=1AU), and aphelion (furthest approach from the sun) is at Mars' orbit.


Suppose that the rockets had fired so that the change in velocity was in the radial direction (outwards). Calculate a (semi major axis) Will this orbit ever reach Mars?

Do you mean that the original velocity change intended for the Hohmann orbit injection was mistakenly made in a radial direction? If so, then no, the orbit would not reach Mars. The Hohmann transfer is the least energy direct transfer orbit. If it's not the Hohmann orbit, then it can't reach Mars with the same energy expenditure.
 
gneill said:
Do you mean that the original velocity change intended for the Hohmann orbit injection was mistakenly made in a radial direction? If so, then no, the orbit would not reach Mars. The Hohmann transfer is the least energy direct transfer orbit. If it's not the Hohmann orbit, then it can't reach Mars with the same energy expenditure.

Yeah i assume it was the least energy in the Hohmann orbit directed outwards. I understand if its the 3 km/s (i calculated that number as being the least v) being directed outward that it won't reach the Mars orbit. How am i able to calculate the semi-major axis?
 
olyviab said:
Yeah i assume it was the least energy in the Hohmann orbit directed outwards. I understand if its the 3 km/s (i calculated that number as being the least v) being directed outward that it won't reach the Mars orbit. How am i able to calculate the semi-major axis?

If you have the new velocity (after the ∆V) and the radius, then you can calculate the total mechanical energy, ξ. Then 2a = -µ/ξ.
 
gneill said:
If you have the new velocity (after the ∆V) and the radius, then you can calculate the total mechanical energy, ξ. Then 2a = -µ/ξ.

Great! Thanks for all the help :)
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top