MHB Optimizing Oz Jeans Manufacturing Costs: Mydney & Selbourne

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bushy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Manufacturing
Bushy
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Oz Jeans has factories in Mydney and Selbourne. At the Mydney factory, fixed costs
are \$28 000 per month and the cost of producing each pair of jeans is \$30. At the Selbourne
factory, fixed costs are \$35 200 per month and the cost of producing each pair of jeans is $24.
During the next month Oz Jeans must manufacture 6000 pairs of jeans. Calculate the production order
for each factory, if the total manufacturing costs
for each factory are to be the same.

I have made the Costs equations equal to solve for ‘n’amount of jeans to get 1200. I.e 28000+30n = 35200+24n, then substituted these back into the Cost equations for each factory. The Answer says 2400 and 3200 which gives the 6000 in thequestion, but I can’t find how they got it..?

 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The equation is
\[
28\,000+30x = 35\,200+24(6000-x).
\]
The solution is $x=2800$, so $6000-2800=3200$.
 
I found it.

a+b=6000
and
30a+28000 = 24y+35200

gives the solution.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top