Optimum gap size for diffraction

Click For Summary
Diffraction is most pronounced when the width of the slit is comparable to the wavelength of light, with significant diffraction occurring when the slit width is on the order of the wavelength (W ≈ λ). If the slit width is much smaller than the wavelength (W < λ), diffraction effects become more pronounced. The discussion emphasizes the need to clarify what is meant by "maximum diffraction," suggesting a focus on quantifying diffraction rather than seeking a maximum. Visual representations of diffraction patterns help illustrate varying degrees of diffraction, with wider slits producing less pronounced patterns. Understanding these concepts is essential for grasping the principles of diffraction in high school physics.
The_Nster
Messages
7
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



Is diffraction at a maximum when the width of the gap is similar in length to the wavelength of the light? (ie. W ≈ λ, where w=width)

Or is it a maximum when the width is smaller than the wavelength? (i.e W < λ)Thanks for the help!

Homework Equations



n/a (this is a homework problem, but it is more theory based, so I have no work or equations)

The Attempt at a Solution


n/a
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by "diffraction at a maximum"? How would you quantify the amount of diffraction?
By width, do you mean the separation of the slits or the width of the slits?
What level is this question posed at?

Usually students are taught an approximation of the diffraction maths which works well when the gap (multi-slit) is of the order of the wavelength of the light.
 
Simon Bridge said:
What do you mean by "diffraction at a maximum"? How would you quantify the amount of diffraction?
By width, do you mean the separation of the slits or the width of the slits?
What level is this question posed at?

Usually students are taught an approximation of the diffraction maths which works well when the gap (multi-slit) is of the order of the wavelength of the light.

Hi Simon, thanks for the reply!

By width, I mean the width of the slit opening (I am referring to single slit diffraction).

As for maximum diffraction, I see how that is not a great way to phrase it. Ignore 'maximum', so instead of "which would cause maximum diffraction", substitute "which would cause the most diffraction".

So you are saying that the most diffraction would occur when the width of the slit is in the same order of magnitude as the wavelength?, so would it then be right to say that less diffraction would occur if the wavelength is multiple orders of magnitude larger than the slit?

thanks for the help again!
 
In that case, same question with the new words.
How do you quantify the amount of diffraction soas to determine what is the most?

If the slit was almost zero width, what would the diffraction pattern look like?
What sort of diffraction work have you done so far? Any math? Any practical?
 
Simon Bridge said:
In that case, same question with the new words.
How do you quantify the amount of diffraction soas to determine what is the most?

If the slit was almost zero width, what would the diffraction pattern look like?
What sort of diffraction work have you done so far? Any math? Any practical?

Hi Simon, thanks for replying again, I really appreciate your help!

I am doing high school level physics (so it should be pretty basic - no complicated math, or experimentation, it is just purely conceptual), and as for 'most' diffraction, look at the image here http://www.imagen-estilo.com/images/Newsimages/diffract.jpg ,where the image in the top left corner represents a 'small amount' of diffraction, and the image in the top right hand corner represents 'larger' diffraction (ignore the bottom image).

I have not done any diffraction work so far, just miscellaneous questions from my textbook (but none of them specifically address this issue)

Hopefully that makes it clearer.

Thanks again for your time and help!
 
So what is itvabout the pics that tells you there is "more diffraction" in one than in the other?
Im not asking for my benifit, but to get you to think more scientifically.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
990
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K