B Orbital Mechanics: GR vs Newton's Laws

Peter Riedt
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
9/1/2016 Orbital mechanics Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This reference states:
"General relativity is a more exact theory than Newton's laws for calculating orbits, and is sometimes necessary for greater accuracy or in highgravity situations (such as orbits close to the Sun)".

Can GR predict/calculate the trajectories of solar objects?"
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it can.
 
Peter Riedt said:
Can GR predict/calculate the trajectories of solar objects?

Newton's laws are a weak field, low speed approximation to GR. So every scenario that you can predict with Newton's laws, you can predict with GR. In many applications in the solar system, the difference in the predictions between the two is too small for us to measure with our current technology. But there are enough cases where the difference is detectable for us to have confirmed with high confidence that GR is more accurate than Newton's laws wherever the two's predictions differ.
 
What are the GR formulas to calculate a planetary distance to the sun or orbital period around the sun or average velocity around the sun?
 
Peter Riedt said:
What are the GR formulas to calculate a planetary distance to the sun or orbital period around the sun or average velocity around the sun?

This is covered in most GR textbooks, including how Newtonian gravity is derived as a weak field, slow motion approximation to GR. It is much too general a topic to address in a PF thread. If you have specific questions about statements in a specific acceptable reference (textbook or peer reviewed paper), please start a separate thread. This thread is closed.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top