Orbital Motion Help: Calculate Altitude of Spacecraft

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the altitude of a spacecraft after a burn to transition from a circular to an elliptical orbit. The spacecraft, initially at 300 km altitude, uses two engines with a total thrust of 50 kN for 35.5 seconds. Key calculations involve determining the change in velocity (delta V) and applying gravitational parameters to find the new apogee altitude. The final consensus among participants is that the apogee altitude is approximately 377 km, with various methods and formulas leading to this result. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using the correct gravitational constants and formulas in orbital mechanics.
chilli_pepper
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi guys and gals

I have been given this question and have spent so far around 4 hours pondering calculating researching and reading and have got no where except into a large state of confusion!

Its probably really really simple but i just can't seem to get logical answers and now i have done so many methods i don't know where i am.

Do you mind giving me some guidance? The question is below:

A spacecraft of mass m = 80000 kg is initially in a circular meridianal orbit of altitude H0 = 300 km above the earth’s surface. When the spacecraft is in the position A above the North Pole its two orbital-manoeuvring-system (OMs) engines, each of which has a trust of F = 25 kN, are fired during the time period dt = 35.5 seconds to increase the velocity of the spacecraft and thus to transfer it to the new elliptical orbit. Calculate the altitude H1 of the spacecraft at the apogee point B of the new elliptical orbit. Ignore the change in position of the spacecraft while the engines are on.

Use the following values for the other required parameters:
Radius of the earth: R = 6371 km
Gravity acceleration: g = 9.825 m/s2


the nearest i have is ~410km but got that using hohmann transfer and data that is not given in this question so doesn't really count!

Any help greatly appreciated

Hope this is the right forum to post it :S its my first post! :)

Many Thanks in Advance

Dan
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
What did you get for your spaceship's delta V?

Why is using Hohmann transfer formulas cheating?

Are you forbidden from using any data not given, such as the Gravitational Constant or the Earth's mass?

Hohmann formulas use mu which is G*M, and without knowing either G or M, you can still compute mu with the info given.

a = mu (1/d^2)
9.825 = mu (1 / 6371^2)
mu = 398793222.825

I got a different final answer than you did. Post your formulas. I may be wrong.
 
Last edited:
I'll post his formulas.

Re = 6371000 meters

R = Re + 300000 meters
R = 6671000 meters

GM = 3.98793E+14 m^3 sec^-2

Vo = sqrt(GM/R)
Vo = 7731.8 m/s

F = 2 (25000 kg m sec^-2)
m = 80000 kg

acc = F/m
acc = 0.625 m sec^-2

t = 35.5 sec

dV = (acc) (t)
dV = 22.1875 m/s

Vf = Vo + dV
Vf = 7753.9 m/s

a = 1 / { 2/R - (Vf)^2 / GM }
a = 6709564 meters

The perigee distance is the same as the burn distance:

Rp = R
Rp = 6671000 meters

e = 1 - Rp/a
e = 0.005748

Ra = a (1+e)
Ra = 6748128 meters

apogee altitude = Ra - Re
apogee altitude = 377.1 kilometers

Jerry Abbott
 
Or, to put it into one long equation...

apogee altitude = 2 / { 2/Rp - [sqrt(GM/Rp) + tF/m]^2 / GM } - Rp - Re

where

Rp is the geocentric distance of the spaceship at perigee (meters)
Re is the Earth's radius (meters)
t is the duration of burn (seconds)
F is the total thrust during burn (Newtons)
m is the mass of the rocket during burn (kilograms, assumed constant)
GM is the gravitational parameter of Earth (m^3 sec^-2)

apogee altitude comes out in meters

Rp is equal to the radius of the original circular orbit

transit of the spaceship during burn is ignored

The billygoat goes back to the barn

Jerry Abbott
 
Last edited:
I get the same answer you do, 377 km altitude, using a simulator instead of formulas.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top