Orbitals and Nucleus - Quick question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Elpinetos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nucleus Orbitals
Elpinetos
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Just a quick question - how come that for electrons we need probability orbitals, but for the nucleus we don't?
Is it because of the difference in mass? Or because of a bigger matter wavelength?
Can we really pinpoint the location of the nucleus or ist it just easier for textbooks to depict it like in the middle?
Or is it simply because of it's size?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The nucleons have some kind of orbitals too, but they are much more difficult to calculate than electronic orbitals because the inter-nucleon potential energy function is not known exactly. Also, the nucleus can usually be treated as a point-like object in electronic structure calculations because of the large difference in length scales. The nucleus is so small because neutrons and protons are much heavier than electrons and because the interaction between them is strong.

Also note that the orbital model of the atom is just an approximation that neglects electron correlation at least partially.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
If you're interested in exactly what corrections there are to get a better model of the hydrogen atom (to start with), wikipedia has excellent articles on
fine structure:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine_structure
and hyperfine structure:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperfine_structure

Fine structure and hyperfine structure are progrssively higher corrections to the energy levels of the hydrogen atom. One term in the fine structure (the Darwin term) accounts for the nucleus being of nonzero size.
 
  • Like
Likes 2 people
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
80
Replies
42
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
36
Views
7K
Back
Top