Orbitals while transitioning from free electron to ground state

rconde01
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I was thinking of putting together a visualization of electron orbitals as it transitions from unbounded or weakly bounded state to the ground state. However, it occurred to me that orbitals are symmetric about the proton. At some point the probability distribution must become asymmetric eventually approaching a point. What am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Coulomb potential always has an infinite number of bound states however weak you chose the central charge. So there won't be a transition from unbound to bound.
 
Dr. Du, of course you can transition from unbound to bound. This is called recombination emission.

The "s", "p", "d", "f"... orbitals are just one way of representing the state, which can have almost arbitrary shape of the electron distribution. The arbitrary shape will be some superposition of orbitals. It is analogous to how an arbitrary wave is a superposition of frequency components. Just as a localized wave-packet doesn't have a single frequency, a localized electron doesn't have a single orbital state.

A weakly bounded atom is called a Rydberg atom. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rydberg_atom
This is a case where a classical representation (planetary model) of an atom can be useful. The corresponding quantum state is some kind of coherent state of the Rydberg atom which mixes angular momentum states.

You might be able to find something by searching for coherent states of Rydberg atom. Good luck. It's not an easy problem. I'm interested in how the results look.
 
Khashishi said:
Dr. Du, of course you can transition from unbound to bound. This is called recombination emission.
Of course. Apparently I was thinking in something completely different to what the OP was asking.
 
It occurs to me if you stick to the simple model of Couloumb potential you are never going to do so. Since central potential has parity symmetry, which means the wave functions chosen are always symmetric or antisymmetric... I think for the more realistic situation, models in condensed matter might be more applicable.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top