Order of Magnitude Difference: Solving with Torricelli & Bernoulli

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around comparing results obtained using Torricelli's law and Bernoulli's equation to determine the velocity of fluid flow, specifically focusing on the discrepancies in the calculated velocities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the application of Torricelli's law and Bernoulli's equation, questioning the validity of the results obtained from each method. There are discussions on how to manipulate the equations, including the removal of terms and the use of the equation of continuity.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided steps in their calculations and raised questions about the assumptions made, particularly regarding the conditions under which the equations are applied. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of ignoring certain terms in the equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of considering instantaneous velocity and the effects of changing height on the calculations. There is also mention of the time spent on resolving discrepancies in the calculations, indicating a level of frustration with the process.

maxolina
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A cylindrical open tank is filled with water, has a depth of 20 m and a hole at the bottom. The tank cross-sectional area is Atank=10 m^2 and the hole's area is Ahole=3x10^-3 m^2. Find the velocity of the fluid at the top surface.
Relevant Equations
EQ. OF CONTINUITY: A*V=constant
BERNOULLI: P+1/2*ro*v^2+ro*g*h=constant
TORRICELLI: V bottom = sqrt ( 2*g*h)
Solving with Torricelli I get Vt = 6x10^-3 m/s

Solving with Bernoulli I get Vt = 6x10^-4 m/s, a whole order of magnitude smaller.

How can it be correct? I know that Torricelli is an approximation, but the solution given by the book uses Torricelli which doesn't seem right to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
maxolina said:
Solving with Bernoulli I get Vt = 6x10^-4 m/s, a whole order of magnitude smaller.
Exactly how did you apply this to get the number? If I use subscript ##T## for "Top" and ##B## for "Bottom", I get $$p_T+\frac{1}{2}\rho~v_T^2+\rho ~g~h_T=p_B+\frac{1}{2}\rho~v_B^2+\rho ~g~h_B.$$Then I note that at the top and at the bottom (exit point) the pressures are the same and equal to atmospheric, ##p_T=p_B##, and the equation becomes $$\frac{1}{2}\rho~v_T^2+\rho ~g~h_T=\frac{1}{2}\rho~v_B^2+\rho ~g~h_B.$$ Now what do you think should be done to get a number?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and berkeman
Ok here is what I did after your equation:

- delete ro*g*hb on the right side since Hb = 0
- remove all the ro (density)

I'm left with Vb^2 - Vt^2 = 2 g h

Using Eq. of continuity: AtVt = AbVb -> Vb = At/Ab * Vt

Then substitute inside Bernoulli and solve for Vt.

(At/Ab)^2 * Vt^2 - Vt^2 = 2 g h

Collect Vt:

Vt^2((At/Ab)^2 -1) = 2 g h

Solve for Vt:

Vt = sqrt ( 2 g h / (At/Ab)^2 -1) = sqrt ( 2*9.8*20 / (10/3*10^-3)^2-1)

Ignore the -1:

Vt = sqrt (400 / ((3.3*10^3)^2)) = 20 / 3 * 10^3 = 6 * 10^-4
 
##AtVt=AbVb=Ab\sqrt(2gh)##
##Vt=(Ab/At)\sqrt(2gh)##

When h is measured, Vt must be considered instantaneous; otherwise, h will decrease, as well as both velocities, as it actually happens.
 
maxolina said:
Ok here is what I did after your equation:

- delete ro*g*hb on the right side since Hb = 0
- remove all the ro (density)

I'm left with Vb^2 - Vt^2 = 2 g h

Using Eq. of continuity: AtVt = AbVb -> Vb = At/Ab * Vt

Then substitute inside Bernoulli and solve for Vt.

(At/Ab)^2 * Vt^2 - Vt^2 = 2 g h

Collect Vt:

Vt^2((At/Ab)^2 -1) = 2 g h

Solve for Vt:

Vt = sqrt ( 2 g h / (At/Ab)^2 -1) = sqrt ( 2*9.8*20 / (10/3*10^-3)^2-1)

Ignore the -1:

Vt = sqrt (400 / ((3.3*10^3)^2)) = 20 / 3 * 10^3 = 6 * 10^-4
You messed up the math in the end. If you ignore the -1, you get
$$v_T\approx \sqrt{2gh}\frac{A_B}{A_T}.$$ Now ##\sqrt{2gh}=20~##m/s. What is the ratio of the areas?
 
kuruman said:
You messed up the math in the end. If you ignore the -1, you get
$$v_T\approx \sqrt{2gh}\frac{A_B}{A_T}.$$ Now ##\sqrt{2gh}=20~##m/s. What is the ratio of the areas?

Oh my god I lost more than an hour over this.
Thank you!
 
maxolina said:
Oh my god I lost more than an hour over this.
Thank you!
Putting in the numbers at the very end is a good habit.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K