Ordering a Sequence: Can We Always Change the Order?

  • Thread starter Thread starter daniel_i_l
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence
AI Thread Summary
It is not always possible to reorder a sequence of real numbers such that each term is greater than or equal to the previous term. A bijective function that achieves this would imply that the sequence has a minimum element, which is not guaranteed. For instance, the sequence defined by a_n = 1/n does not have a smallest member, making it impossible to reorder it into a non-decreasing sequence. Therefore, the existence of a bijective function for all sequences is not assured. This highlights the limitations of reordering sequences in mathematics.
daniel_i_l
Gold Member
Messages
864
Reaction score
0
Lets say we have a sequence of reals. Is it always possible to change the order to that for all n a_{n+1} >= a_n?
Or in other words,
Does there always exist a bijective function:
f:Z->Z (where Z is the set of positive natural numbers) so that for all n
a_{f(n+1)} >= a_{f(n)}?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
No. That would imply that a_n\le a_m as long as m> n. In particular, a1 would have to be the smallest number in the list- and the list may not have a smallest member! {an}= 1/n, for example, has no smallest member and so cannot be "reordered" to be increasing.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top