Ordering/purchasing new seating solutions

  • Thread starter Thread starter studionorth
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
In a discussion about seating solutions in research labs, the importance of selecting appropriate Sit/Stand stools is highlighted. Key considerations include ensuring that seating height is compatible with various work surfaces, as mismatched heights can hinder productivity. The need for adjustable seating that accommodates different user heights is emphasized, particularly for those who are shorter. Mobility features like wheels can be beneficial, but locking mechanisms are recommended to prevent drifting during detailed tasks. Additionally, the design of chairs should minimize bulk, as arms can obstruct movement in crowded lab environments. Ultimately, a balance between comfort and functionality is crucial, with some participants suggesting that fewer chairs may be more effective to maintain workspace efficiency.
studionorth
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

My name is brian and I work at a research lab in MN. I just had a general question for all who work in a research lab environment. I have been assigned the task of ordering/purchasing new seating solutions. I was curious as to how many of you use Sit/Stand stools in your everyday activities. Lab bench/fume hood/ microscopy/etc... I have been getting a few requests and was hoping to get some feedback. Are they accomodating? Should I get ones that are mobile?

Thanks for the Help!

Brian
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Seating solutions? Is that what they call it now? :smile: Okay, here's the deal...make sure the seat is tall enough to reach whatever the work surface is...low chairs and high benches, or tall stools and low benches don't work well together, and this apparently is a challenging concept for those who design new labs. Also, the highest position on a low chair should overlap with the lowest position on the higher stools. Otherwise, those of us who are height-challenged find that no chair in the place is the right height for us...half are an inch or two too low, and the other half an inch or two too high to get comfortable. Not everyone is a 6' tall male.

For some purposes, wheels on chairs are nice, but better if they can be locked, or just have some that don't have wheels. Otherwise, when you're trying to sit in one place to do something that requires fine detail work, and the chair is too high for you to reach your feet to the floor, it gets really annoying to keep drifting away from the bench.

Oh, and the last thing is that arms on the chairs usually just get in the way. They may look comfy, but when you're working in a crowded lab, and people need to get around you constantly, the smaller the footprint of the chair, the better. Otherwise, you end up with the outcome I usually have which is to toss all the chairs out except for one or two for functions that really do require you to be seated. It's often easier to just stand and too many chairs just get in the way.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top