Orientation of Lowest Energy Photons from Hydrogen

  • Thread starter Thread starter HarryWertM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photon
HarryWertM
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
What is the orientation of a photon emitted by an atom? By orientation, I mean the direction of the photon's travel relative to the orbital axis of the electron. Consider only the lowest energy photons from Hydrogen atoms. I am sure I would not understand anything more complex.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OK, my own best answer... There are no "planar" orbits in modern atomic theory which might - might, as far as I know - be the "standing wave model" in which there is no way to define an orbital axis and thus no orientation for an emitted photon.

This leaves much for a civilian to wonder about. In particular, I read somewhere - don't ask where - that the lowest energy wave function for a hydrogen electron oscillates back and forth directly through the nucleus. This obviously defines an orientation which in turn might define some experimental observables for photon absorption. Like in frozen hydrogen? What kinds of results can be predicted if a sample of frozen hydrogen is zapped in the new attosecond x-ray laser at SLAC?

Behind this particular subject is the more sense of just how much "reality" there is in modern physics. There seems no end to experimental phenomena of uncertain predictability as well as no end to new theories. Does anybody really understand anything?
 
HarryWertM said:
What is the orientation of a photon emitted by an atom? By orientation, I mean the direction of the photon's travel relative to the orbital axis of the electron. Consider only the lowest energy photons from Hydrogen atoms. I am sure I would not understand anything more complex.
There isn't, it's indeterminate. If you measure the atom's recoil, *then* you can say that the photon took the opposite direction (entanglement), but with many repetitions of the experiment you would find all possible directions.
 
Photons get emitted when electrons in atoms transition from higher energy states to lower energy states. There are many different transitions an atom can undergo depending on which energy state it starts in. Photons emitted in a given transition are more likely to go in some directions than others. As you note, for one direction to be more probable than another requires something to pick out a special direction--this is done by the angular momentum of the atom, which points in a certain direction (even though the electrons don't have well-defined "orbits").

HarryWertM said:
There seems no end to experimental phenomena of uncertain predictability as well as no end to new theories. Does anybody really understand anything?

Quantum mechanics is very well understood. It simply predicts probabilities instead of certainties when you measure certain quantities, and gives mathematical reasons why this is the best you can do. Certainly there are plenty of theories about many poorly-understood phenomena, but as http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2010/09/23/the-laws-underlying-the-physics-of-everyday-life-are-completely-understood/" points out, "the laws underlying the physics of everyday life are completely understood."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top