Origin of Universe: Big Bang Theory

  • Thread starter Thread starter Supernovah
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Origin Universe
Supernovah
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
-Bearing in mind i ask this based on a theory of the big bang.

Could all existent matter have been packed into a single atom of infinite energy levels, meaning as the universe 'expands' it is actually losing energy and will eventually be infinitly large and contain no energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
oh and a further thought, on the same train of thought...
Does this mean that there is a maximum possible age to the universe based on the ratio of energy loss from the bigbang - till now - till the energy the universe (as a mass entity) contains is = to 0?. Does this mean the universe will 'live' forever?
 
crap...

I need to read some stuff then i might change what I am confused about - BTW I am no physicist or anything, just a student so there are most definately a lot of things i am clueless of that will make my suggestion ludacrous or even moronic to the poeple of this forum =D
 
Supernovah said:
-Bearing in mind i ask this based on a theory of the big bang.

Could all existent matter have been packed into a single atom of infinite energy levels, meaning as the universe 'expands' it is actually losing energy and will eventually be infinitly large and contain no energy?

Not without energy but the "absense" of energy. It would be nothing and something at the same time but not in the same spot all at the same time and everything.
 
I bet right now, someone with an expansive knowledge is thinking 'haha this newbie has no idea' and that's the truth, I am just thinking - Put some Theoratical law into this which makes my idea impossible
 
Supernovah said:
-Bearing in mind i ask this based on a theory of the big bang.

Could all existent matter have been packed into a single atom of infinite energy levels, meaning as the universe 'expands' it is actually losing energy and will eventually be infinitly large and contain no energy?

Why would the fact that the universe 'expands' mean that it loses energy? The "energy density" would decrease but the total energy remain the same.
 
Supernovah said:
I bet right now, someone with an expansive knowledge is thinking 'haha this newbie has no idea' and that's the truth, I am just thinking - Put some Theoratical law into this which makes my idea impossible

Do you have any retorts or are you really a newb?

I have my ideas do you have yours?

If you don't then why help waste my time?
 
yes...

Yeah energy density i guess is what I am referring to, though that isn't really a commonly used term i guess... what i mean is if the universe became infinitly large, then the density of energy would be infinitly small, and such the quantity of space with no energy would vastly increase. At the stage where this largness is at its threshold (if there is one) is it possible to distinguish what it is or if there is one?
I would assume at that point, the universe becomes elastic and its boundaries become flexable creating a very similar to 'dynamic' outer boundaries of the Universe. However it would no be able to pass that point and as it gets nearer, more energy is pulling together than the universe has energy to expand.
Edit: this is what would create the dynamic state
added: This space is theoratically a vacuum, how does it exist as a contributing part of the universe?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
991
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
1K
Back
Top