Original Physics Experiment Ideas: Building a Resonance Column in Four Days

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lianah
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ideas
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around creating original physics experiments, specifically focusing on building a resonance column within a tight four-day deadline. Suggestions include investigating how different materials affect resonance, measuring the speed of sound using the column, and exploring the relationships between air pressure and temperature with resonance frequencies. Additionally, the idea of constructing a musical instrument from the resonance column is proposed to enhance the project. Emphasis is placed on maintaining a clear hypothesis and a well-structured procedure for successful experimentation.
Lianah
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Please, Please Help Me Out! Ideas, Ideas

My physics group has been given an PROJECT to come up with some original experiment ideas . The experiment needs to be recording a 'sensible' variable. I came up with a great idea of building a resonance collumn, like a matchstick building and trying to see at which frequencies it becomes unstable.
My teacher said it was a 2nd yr university project, really complicated,blah.
Anyway, we have just 4 more days to come up with ideas of original, not textbook experiments and i was wondering whether anybody has any gr8 suggestions. I'm sort of in a panic now so PLEASE help out :confused:
Any help will be appreciated o:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Alright, how about the non-linear pendulum:

\frac{d^2\theta}{d t^2} + (g/L)\sin{\theta} = 0


Don't see this one much in undergrad (I think). Did you know it can be used to model the motion of a pendulum on a rigid rod that you push so hard it goes round and round? Well I'm pretty sure, never comparred the calculations, which I've done, to a real pendulum. Maybe you can though? Anyway if you choose to use it, either me or the group here can show you how to solve it in terms of "elliptical" functions (not complicated).
 


Building a resonance column in just four days can be a challenging task, but it is definitely achievable with the right approach. Here are a few ideas that you can consider for your experiment:

1. Investigating the effects of different materials on resonance: Instead of using a traditional resonance column made of glass, you can explore the effects of using different materials such as plastic, metal, or wood. This can be done by constructing resonance columns using these materials and comparing their resonance frequencies.

2. Measuring the speed of sound using a resonance column: You can use the resonance column to measure the speed of sound in air. This can be done by varying the length of the column and observing the corresponding resonance frequencies. By using the formula v = fλ, where v is the speed of sound, f is the frequency, and λ is the wavelength, you can calculate the speed of sound.

3. Investigating the relationship between air pressure and resonance: The speed of sound is affected by the air pressure, and you can explore this relationship by changing the air pressure in the resonance column and measuring the corresponding changes in resonance frequencies.

4. Exploring the effects of temperature on resonance: Another variable that affects the speed of sound is temperature. You can investigate this relationship by varying the temperature of the air in the resonance column and observing the changes in resonance frequencies.

5. Building a musical instrument using a resonance column: You can take your experiment a step further by using the resonance column to create a musical instrument. By changing the length of the column, you can produce different musical notes and explore the principles of sound and music.

Remember, the key to a successful experiment is to have a clear hypothesis, a well-designed procedure, and accurate data collection and analysis. With just four days, it is important to keep your ideas simple and feasible. Good luck!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top