Orthochronous transformations?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter myleo727
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transformations
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on demonstrating that a matrix A, with a determinant of 1 and a non-negative 00th component, preserves the sign of the time component of time-like vectors. Participants emphasize the importance of using the relation \Lambda^\mu_{\ \alpha}\Lambda^\nu_{\ \beta}\eta^{\alpha\beta}=\eta^{\mu\nu} and matrix multiplication to analyze the transformed vector's time component. Additionally, understanding the velocity of a Lorentz transformation and the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality in \mathbb R^3 is crucial for solving the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Matrix multiplication and properties
  • Understanding of Lorentz transformations
  • Cauchy-Schwarz inequality in \mathbb R^3
  • Basic knowledge of determinants and their implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Lorentz transformations and their velocities
  • Learn about the implications of determinants in linear transformations
  • Review matrix multiplication techniques and their applications
  • Explore the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and its geometric interpretations
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics and mathematics, particularly those focusing on relativity, linear algebra, and transformations of time-like vectors.

myleo727
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
How can one show that if det A = 1 and the 00th component of A > = 1 then A preserves the sign of the time component of time-like vectors? thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: write out the terms of the time component of the transformed vector. You need to show this doesn't change sign.

A helpful relation is:

[tex] \Lambda^\mu_{\ \alpha}\Lambda^\nu_{\ \beta}\eta^{\alpha\beta}=\eta^{\mu\nu}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Use the definition of matrix multiplication on [itex](\Lambda x)_{00}[/itex] (row 0, column 0 of the matrix [itex]\Lambda x[/itex]). (Forget you ever even heard of tensors. This problem involves matrices and their components, nothing else). You need to translate the assumption that x is timelike to a relationship between its components, and use it.

I think you also need to know what I said about the velocity of a Lorentz transformation in this post. If you don't, you're going to have to prove algebraically that this velocity is <1 (using the condition in Daverz's post, which I prefer to write as [itex]\Lambda^T\eta\Lambda=\eta[/itex]).

You also need to understand the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for vectors in [itex]\mathbb R^3[/itex] with the standard inner product.

If you get stuck, show us where.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K