Orthogonal Polarisation in EM waves and Interference

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interference of electromagnetic (EM) waves with orthogonal polarizations, specifically horizontal and vertical. It is established that when two EM waves with linear polarizations are phase-shifted by any integer multiple of π, the resultant wave remains linear. However, a phase shift of π/2 between two orthogonal polarizations results in circular polarization. The mathematical representation of the resultant wave is provided, emphasizing the importance of understanding the polarization states in relation to phase shifts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic wave theory
  • Familiarity with linear, circular, and elliptical polarization
  • Basic knowledge of phase shifts in wave mechanics
  • Mathematical representation of wave functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical representation of circular and elliptical polarization
  • Learn about Lissajous Figures and their relation to wave interference
  • Explore the implications of phase shifts on wave intensity and interference
  • Investigate the applications of orthogonal polarizations in optical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and electrical engineering, particularly those interested in wave optics, polarization phenomena, and electromagnetic theory.

ThunderLight
Messages
27
Reaction score
2
I've been trying to get my head around Polarisation and how it achieves orthogonality. I'm not sure if this should be in Physics or Electrical Engineering Section. (Mods can move this where appropriate)

I know that 2 EM wave with linear polarisations where one wave is shifted by π, they would interfere.
But, if we now have those 2 same waves and assign opposing polarisations to each (1 wave with Horizontal Polarisation and the other with Vertical Polarisation), would this π shift still interfere, or they would be completely orthogonal to one another? --- Or basically give me an entirely new wave with the polarised vector additions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have two waves with perpendicular polarizations and are shifted by ##\pi## radians with each other. Mathematically, the sum of these two waves at a fixed position along its propagation direction (which is arbitrarily taken to be the z direction) will be
$$
\mathbf E(t) = \hat x E_{0x} \cos(\omega t +\phi) - \hat y E_{0y} \cos(\omega t +\phi)
$$
where ##E_{0x}## and ##E_{0y}## are the amplitudes of the perpendicularly interfering waves. Taking out the cosine factors gives you
$$
\mathbf E(t) = (\hat x E_{0x} - \hat y E_{0y}) \cos(\omega t +\phi)
$$
How would you describe the polarization state of the resultant wave, is it linear, circular, or elliptical?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ThunderLight
. . . . and what would happen if the two φ values were different in the first equation. In particular, if the difference between the two φs was π/2? But the E fields would always be orthogonal.

ThunderLight said:
and how it achieves orthogonality.
Not sure what this wording means. Spatial orthogonality would mean that the E fields are at right angles to each other. Neither has a component in the direction of the other.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ThunderLight
blue_leaf77 said:
How would you describe the polarization state of the resultant wave, is it linear, circular, or elliptical?

It seems to be linear (although I read a few days ago, that Vertical+Horizontal results in circular polarisation, so I may/must be wrong), but I will need to brush up on the mathematical representation of the circular and elliptical waves. I haven't done physics for a long time, so I appreciate you teaching me the above. Thank you
 
Last edited:
sophiecentaur said:
Not sure what this wording means. Spatial orthogonality would mean that the E fields are at right angles to each other. Neither has a component in the direction of the other.

What could be orthogonal physically, is not necessarily orthogonal to EM systems. So, what I mean here is whether an EM system would differentiate between the 2 waves, although they interfere with one anther? Or will their polarisations prevent this interference, and have the system see them as independent waves, not a summation or difference from one another.

Basically, looking at power intensity of the wave, and whether different polarisations could decrease power intensity due to interference like superimposed same linear polarisation waves do.

And thank you very much for answering many of my questions. Your answers are really appreciated
 
ThunderLight said:
It seems to be linear
It is linear.
ThunderLight said:
Vertical+Horizontal results in circular polarisation
If the phase shift is any integer multiple of ##\pi##, the resulting wave is linear. Other than those values, the polarization takes a different form. In order to convince yourself, I suggest that you try sophiecentaur's suggestion.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ThunderLight
blue_leaf77 said:
It is linear.

If the phase shift is any integer multiple of ##\pi##, the resulting wave is linear. Other than those values, the polarization takes a different form. In order to convince yourself, I suggest that you try sophiecentaur's suggestion.
Aha, I understand you. Thank you very much Blue Leaf
Very helpful to always remember that a phase shift of any multiple of ##\pi## will result in a linear wave.
 
ThunderLight said:
Aha, I understand you. Thank you very much Blue Leaf
Very helpful to always remember that a phase shift of any multiple of ##\pi## will result in a linear wave.
With the (time) phase difference between the two orthogonal plane polarised waves is π/2 (or you could say one is a cos and the other is a sin) the result will be circular polarisation (ref Lissajous Figures) with the resultant vector turning through 2π every time it advances by one wavelength (aka after a period 1/f).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ThunderLight

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K