Orthogonality from infinitesimal small rotation

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
Warlord_
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello buddies,

Could someone please help me to understand where the second and the third equalities came from?
Thanks,

Page-question-tensor.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Um... Ok, it's a little difficult to know what level of detail you want.

The first equation essentially says that the length of a vector does not change under rotations. The second one follows from the first one using the chain rule, and assuming delta of gik is zero.
 
Thanks for answering,

gik is basically the inner product of the base set vector, i.e., <ei,ek>.
- Could you please explicit the chain rule?
- is vik time dependent? And since it is an infinitely small matrix, the ##\delta v^k_i = I##?

Thanks