I Orthogonality of Momentum Eigenstates: Why is ##\int e^{-ix}e^{2ix}dx=0##?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Isaac0427
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orthogonality
Isaac0427
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
718
Reaction score
163
Consider two momentum eigenstates ##\phi_1## and ##\phi_2## representing momenta ##p_1## and ##p_2##. For the sake of easy numbers, ##p_1=1*\hbar## (with ##k=1##) and ##p_2=2*\hbar## (with ##k=2##). Thus, ##\phi_1=e^{ix}## and ##\phi_2=e^{2ix}##. Orthogonality states that
##\int \phi_1^*\phi_2dx=\int e^{-ix}e^{2ix}dx=0##
Why is this?

I understand how orthogonality would work with dirac deltas (i.e. I know why position eigenfunctions are orthogonal in position space and why momentum eigenfunctions are orthogonal in momentum space, etc.) but I am unclear of how it works with plane waves.

Also, I am specifically asking why ##\int e^{-ix}e^{2ix}dx=0##, not why orthogonality works in general (I understand its derivation using the definition of hermitian operators and the inner product).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could first try to plot some graphs of real functions ##\sin k_1 x \sin k_2 x## where ##k_2## is much larger than ##k_1## and convince yourself of the fact that there's practically as much "positive" as "negative" surface area between the graph and the x-axis.
 
  • Like
Likes Jilang and Isaac0427
hilbert2 said:
You could first try to plot some graphs of real functions ##\sin k_1 x \sin k_2 x## where ##k_2## is much larger than ##k_1## and convince yourself of the fact that there's practically as much "positive" as "negative" surface area between the graph and the x-axis.
I guess then that my question is how do you numerically evaluate that improper integral?
 
When talking about rigorous mathematics, the improper integral does not converge, but I guess you can show that if you calculate an integral ##\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-a|x|}e^{-ix}e^{2ix}dx## (which does converge) and take the limit ##a \rightarrow 0+##, then you get value 0.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top